Legal Certainty of Business use Rights Certificate (SHPTU) as Credit Collateral Due to Default

SHPTU, credit collateral, default, fiduciary, cessie, legal certainty This study examines the legal certainty surrounding the use of the Business Use Rights Certificate (SHPTU) as credit collateral in cases of default. Although the Regional Regulation of DKI Jakarta Province Number 7 of 2018 states that SHPTU can be used as collateral, it does not explicitly define whether SHPTU constitutes a property right or a personal right. Using a normative-empirical legal research method, this study is based on primary data from interviews and secondary data from legislation and legal literature. The findings indicate that SHPTU closely resembles a leasehold right rather than ownership, and therefore, cannot be used as a collateral object under material security mechanisms such as fiduciary or mortgage. In the event of default, SHPTU cannot be executed directly. The resolution must involve mediation and assignment of receivables (cessie) through a power of attorney agreement. This study recommends the need for clearer regulation to ensure legal certainty and protection for creditors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.59141/jiss.v6i6.1788
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Legal Certainty of Business use Rights Certificate (SHPTU) as Credit Collateral Due to Default

Wilson Hartanto Widjaja, James Kan
1 links
Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

Legal Certainty of Business use Rights Certificate (SHPTU) as Credit Collateral Due to Default

Wilson Hartanto Widjaja, James Kan
article en

Abstract

SHPTU, credit collateral, default, fiduciary, cessie, legal certainty This study examines the legal certainty surrounding the use of the Business Use Rights Certificate (SHPTU) as credit collateral in cases of default. Although the Regional Regulation of DKI Jakarta Province Number 7 of 2018 states that SHPTU can be used as collateral, it does not explicitly define whether SHPTU constitutes a property right or a personal right. Using a normative-empirical legal research method, this study is based on primary data from interviews and secondary data from legislation and legal literature. The findings indicate that SHPTU closely resembles a leasehold right rather than ownership, and therefore, cannot be used as a collateral object under material security mechanisms such as fiduciary or mortgage. In the event of default, SHPTU cannot be executed directly. The resolution must involve mediation and assignment of receivables (cessie) through a power of attorney agreement. This study recommends the need for clearer regulation to ensure legal certainty and protection for creditors.

Jurnal Indonesia Sosial SainsVol. 6(6)
Pelita Harapan University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Legal Certainty of Business use Rights Certificate (SHPTU) as Credit Collateral Due to Default — Wilson Hartanto Widjaja, James Kan · Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS