Effectiveness of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Trademark Protection in Indonesia: Challenges and Solutions

This article examines the challenges and solutions in trademark dispute resolution in Indonesia, with a particular focus on the effectiveness of existing regulations and the implementation of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods, such as mediation and arbitration. While Law No. 20 of 2016 provides legal protection for registered trademarks, law enforcement in the digital era faces numerous challenges, including trademark infringements occurring on e-commerce platforms. The article demonstrates that ADR can offer a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to litigation; however, a key challenge lies in the limited awareness among business actors about the benefits of ADR. Consequently, this article recommends enhancing education for business owners, strengthening regulations related to ADR, and improving the quality of mediators and arbitrators in the field of intellectual property law. Furthermore, the article emphasizes the need for integrating technology into the dispute resolution process to improve efficiency and accessibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Justice Voice
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37893/jv.v4i1.1155
Primary Topic
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Trademark Protection in Indonesia: Challenges and Solutions

Moh. Karim, Novi Rahayu Ningsih
Justice Voice
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
article

Effectiveness of Alternative Dispute Resolution in Trademark Protection in Indonesia: Challenges and Solutions

Moh. Karim, Novi Rahayu Ningsih
article en

Abstract

This article examines the challenges and solutions in trademark dispute resolution in Indonesia, with a particular focus on the effectiveness of existing regulations and the implementation of alternative dispute resolution (ADR) methods, such as mediation and arbitration. While Law No. 20 of 2016 provides legal protection for registered trademarks, law enforcement in the digital era faces numerous challenges, including trademark infringements occurring on e-commerce platforms. The article demonstrates that ADR can offer a more efficient and cost-effective alternative to litigation; however, a key challenge lies in the limited awareness among business actors about the benefits of ADR. Consequently, this article recommends enhancing education for business owners, strengthening regulations related to ADR, and improving the quality of mediators and arbitrators in the field of intellectual property law. Furthermore, the article emphasizes the need for integrating technology into the dispute resolution process to improve efficiency and accessibility.

Justice VoiceVol. 4(1)
Universitas Trunodjoyo Madura (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Indonesian Legal and Regulatory Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.