Do Recent DNA Studies Refute a 65 kya Arrival of Humans in Sahul?

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Archaeology in Oceania/Archæology & physical anthropology in Oceania
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/arco.70005
Primary Topic
Archaeology and Historical Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Do Recent DNA Studies Refute a 65 kya Arrival of Humans in Sahul?

Adam Brumm, Elizabeth Matisoo‐Smith, Peter Veth, Huw S. Groucutt et al.
Archaeology in Oceania/Archæology & physical anthropology in Oceania
Archaeology and Historical Studies
article

Do Recent DNA Studies Refute a 65 kya Arrival of Humans in Sahul?

Adam Brumm, Elizabeth Matisoo‐Smith, Peter Veth, Huw S. Groucutt, Eleanor M. L. Scerri
article en

Abstract

No abstract available for this paper.
Archaeology in Oceania/Archæology & physical anthropology in OceaniaVol. 60(2)
Griffith University (AU), The University of Western Australia (AU), University of Cologne (DE), University of Malta (MT), Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History (DE), Max Planck Institute of Geoanthropology, University of Otago (NZ)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Archaeology and Historical Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Do Recent DNA Studies Refute a 65 kya Arrival of Humans in Sahul? — Adam Brumm, Elizabeth Matisoo‐Smith, et al. · Archaeology in Oceania/Archæology & physical anthropology in Oceania (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS