State as Shareholder: Comparison Between Indonesia and Singapore

This article examines the role of the state as a shareholder under Indonesia’s reformed State-Owned Enterprises (SOE) Law, comparing it with the approach in Singapore. The aim is to provide a preliminary discussion on the corporate governance of Indonesian SOEs under the new legal framework, while addressing gaps in existing literature on SOE governance, particularly in Asia. Using a juridical normative method with a comparative approach, the research reveals key differences in the regulation of the state’s role as a shareholder in both countries. These differences are explored from the perspectives of the state’s economic motivations, the separation of its regulatory and shareholder functions, and its involvement in SOE investment and management decisions. The article argues that no single corporate governance model is inherently superior. As a result, the future success of Indonesian SOEs under the reformed law, in comparison to Singapore’s model, remains an open question for further study.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Justice Voice
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.37893/jv.v4i1.1159
Primary Topic
Corporate Finance and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

State as Shareholder: Comparison Between Indonesia and Singapore

Bunga Dita Rahma Cesaria
Justice Voice
Corporate Finance and Governance
article

State as Shareholder: Comparison Between Indonesia and Singapore

Bunga Dita Rahma Cesaria
article en

Abstract

This article examines the role of the state as a shareholder under Indonesia’s reformed State-Owned Enterprises (SOE) Law, comparing it with the approach in Singapore. The aim is to provide a preliminary discussion on the corporate governance of Indonesian SOEs under the new legal framework, while addressing gaps in existing literature on SOE governance, particularly in Asia. Using a juridical normative method with a comparative approach, the research reveals key differences in the regulation of the state’s role as a shareholder in both countries. These differences are explored from the perspectives of the state’s economic motivations, the separation of its regulatory and shareholder functions, and its involvement in SOE investment and management decisions. The article argues that no single corporate governance model is inherently superior. As a result, the future success of Indonesian SOEs under the reformed law, in comparison to Singapore’s model, remains an open question for further study.

Justice VoiceVol. 4(1)
President University (ID)
Openalex Percentile: Top 77%
Corporate Finance and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.