Bureaucratic politics in customized implementation of the EU Single-Use Plastics Directive in France and Germany

Abstract When implementing EU policies, national policy bureaucracies often face a goal conflict when national policy preferences are not aligned with the EU policy and they are granted little discretion in implementation: While customized implementation allows them to adjust EU policies to the national context, it also risks noncompliance with EU law and blame for unpopular EU policies. This bureaucratic politics perspective has received little attention in institutionalist and interest-based explanations of customized implementation. With a bureaucratic politics approach, this article argues that national governments pursue strategies of blame avoidance and reputation seeking when confronted with high goal conflict between timely and correct implementation and substantive (national) policy goals. This argument is illustrated in a comparative case study on the implementation of the EU Single-Use Plastics Directive in France and Germany. This article identifies bureaucratic strategies of blame avoidance and reputation seeking as an underlying mechanism of customized implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Public Policy
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/s0143814x2500011x
Primary Topic
Innovation, Technology, and Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bureaucratic politics in customized implementation of the EU Single-Use Plastics Directive in France and Germany

Anna Simstich
Journal of Public Policy
Innovation, Technology, and Society
article

Bureaucratic politics in customized implementation of the EU Single-Use Plastics Directive in France and Germany

Anna Simstich
article en

Abstract

Abstract When implementing EU policies, national policy bureaucracies often face a goal conflict when national policy preferences are not aligned with the EU policy and they are granted little discretion in implementation: While customized implementation allows them to adjust EU policies to the national context, it also risks noncompliance with EU law and blame for unpopular EU policies. This bureaucratic politics perspective has received little attention in institutionalist and interest-based explanations of customized implementation. With a bureaucratic politics approach, this article argues that national governments pursue strategies of blame avoidance and reputation seeking when confronted with high goal conflict between timely and correct implementation and substantive (national) policy goals. This argument is illustrated in a comparative case study on the implementation of the EU Single-Use Plastics Directive in France and Germany. This article identifies bureaucratic strategies of blame avoidance and reputation seeking as an underlying mechanism of customized implementation.

Journal of Public PolicyVol. 45(3)
Helmut Schmidt University (DE)
University of Cambridge
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Innovation, Technology, and Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bureaucratic politics in customized implementation of the EU Single-Use Plastics Directive in France and Germany — Anna Simstich · Journal of Public Policy (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS