Efficacy of vestibular tests for differential diagnosis of acute vestibular disorders: a cross-sectional study

Abstract Background Acute vestibular syndrome (AVS) is characterized by a severe vertigo attack that lasts longer than 24 hours, accompanied by nausea and vomiting. There are numerous clinical conditions that can cause AVS, some of which require prompt attention and a suitable differential diagnosis for the best possible outcome for the patient. While there are numerous objective vestibular tests available for the diagnosis of vestibular disorders, there are few studies that show these tests’ effectiveness for differentiating between AVS conditions. Method Aim of the present study was to investigate the predictive value of vestibular tests in differential diagnosis of acute unilateral vestibular neuropathy AUVP & VM which are common causes of AVS syndrome. This was a retrospective study of 108 patients with primary complaint of vertigo. Out of these, the clinical signs and symptoms of 17 patients were suggestive of AUVP while sign and symptoms of 10 were suggestive of VM as per the Classification of Vestibular Disorders by the Bárány Society (2022). Vestibular evoked myogenic response, both cervical and ocular (cVEMP and oVEMP) and video head impulse test (vHIT) findings were reviewed and analyzed for these selected patients. Results Chi-square analysis showed a significant association of amplitude asymmetry parameter of VEMP with type of disorder ( χ 2 = 7.1; P < 0.01). Analysis of vHIT results showed that abnormal results were observed in 14 (82%) patients with AUVN while it was abnormal in 3 (30%) patients with VM ( χ 2 = 5.1, P < 0.05). Hence, VEMP and video head impulse test both should be used to differentially diagnose the patients with AUVP from VM. Conclusions VEMP and video head impulse tests both are used to differentially diagnose the patients with AUVP from VM.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43163-025-00809-3
Primary Topic
Vestibular and auditory disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of vestibular tests for differential diagnosis of acute vestibular disorders: a cross-sectional study

Sankar Prasad Gorthi, C. S. Vanaja, Sharda Sarda, Priscilla Joshi et al.
The Egyptian Journal of Otolaryngology
Vestibular and auditory disorders
article

Efficacy of vestibular tests for differential diagnosis of acute vestibular disorders: a cross-sectional study

Sankar Prasad Gorthi, C. S. Vanaja, Sharda Sarda, Priscilla Joshi, R Chetana
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Acute vestibular syndrome (AVS) is characterized by a severe vertigo attack that lasts longer than 24 hours, accompanied by nausea and vomiting. There are numerous clinical conditions that can cause AVS, some of which require prompt attention and a suitable differential diagnosis for the best possible outcome for the patient. While there are numerous objective vestibular tests available for the diagnosis of vestibular disorders, there are few studies that show these tests’ effectiveness for differentiating between AVS conditions. Method Aim of the present study was to investigate the predictive value of vestibular tests in differential diagnosis of acute unilateral vestibular neuropathy AUVP & VM which are common causes of AVS syndrome. This was a retrospective study of 108 patients with primary complaint of vertigo. Out of these, the clinical signs and symptoms of 17 patients were suggestive of AUVP while sign and symptoms of 10 were suggestive of VM as per the Classification of Vestibular Disorders by the Bárány Society (2022). Vestibular evoked myogenic response, both cervical and ocular (cVEMP and oVEMP) and video head impulse test (vHIT) findings were reviewed and analyzed for these selected patients. Results Chi-square analysis showed a significant association of amplitude asymmetry parameter of VEMP with type of disorder ( χ 2 = 7.1; P < 0.01). Analysis of vHIT results showed that abnormal results were observed in 14 (82%) patients with AUVN while it was abnormal in 3 (30%) patients with VM ( χ 2 = 5.1, P < 0.05). Hence, VEMP and video head impulse test both should be used to differentially diagnose the patients with AUVP from VM. Conclusions VEMP and video head impulse tests both are used to differentially diagnose the patients with AUVP from VM.

The Egyptian Journal of OtolaryngologyVol. 41(1)
Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) (IN)
Indian Council of Medical Research
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Vestibular and auditory disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.