Dialogues entre les espaces littéraires: de la notion d’« autofiction » chez Vladimir Zarev et Zachary Karabashliev

The article focuses on the slow entry of the term autofiction in Bulgarian literary critique. Our interest in this notion has been elicited initially by its large presence in French- and English-speaking critique from the end of the 20th century, and also by the fact that there are contemporary Bulgarian works that can be labelled as autofiction.Having appeared in the 1970s, the term demonstrates great vitality and has also been applied to works from previous periods. Similarly, even if it is just emerging in contemporary Bulgarian critique (the second half of 2010s and the early 2020s, mostly concerning works of Bulgarian authors published abroad and later translated into Bulgarian), it is applicable to earlier Bulgarian works. For the aims of the present study, we have analysed two novels: Vladimir Zarev’s Ruin (Разруха) (2004) and Zachary Karabashliev’s 18% Grey (2008).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Colloquia Comparativa Litterarum.
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.60056/ccl.2025.11.84-95
Primary Topic
French Literature and Critical Theory
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dialogues entre les espaces littéraires: de la notion d’« autofiction » chez Vladimir Zarev et Zachary Karabashliev

Emanuela Tchitchova
Colloquia Comparativa Litterarum.
French Literature and Critical Theory
article

Dialogues entre les espaces littéraires: de la notion d’« autofiction » chez Vladimir Zarev et Zachary Karabashliev

Emanuela Tchitchova
article en

Abstract

The article focuses on the slow entry of the term autofiction in Bulgarian literary critique. Our interest in this notion has been elicited initially by its large presence in French- and English-speaking critique from the end of the 20th century, and also by the fact that there are contemporary Bulgarian works that can be labelled as autofiction.Having appeared in the 1970s, the term demonstrates great vitality and has also been applied to works from previous periods. Similarly, even if it is just emerging in contemporary Bulgarian critique (the second half of 2010s and the early 2020s, mostly concerning works of Bulgarian authors published abroad and later translated into Bulgarian), it is applicable to earlier Bulgarian works. For the aims of the present study, we have analysed two novels: Vladimir Zarev’s Ruin (Разруха) (2004) and Zachary Karabashliev’s 18% Grey (2008).

Colloquia Comparativa Litterarum.Vol. 11
New Bulgarian University (BG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
French Literature and Critical Theory
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.