The selection of Priority Assessment Domains for Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes as National Quality Indicator in Korean Healthcare

Purpose: The objective of this study is to develop criteria for selecting suitable areas for measuring PRO in the Korean healthcare system and to prioritize the domains based on these criteria for the PRO introduction.Methods: The study established criteria for prioritizing PRO areas using the RAND/UCLA modified Delphi method, which was conducted with nine experts. The expert group consisted of five academic and clinical experts, two members of the quality evaluation committee and two patient representatives. By conducting two rounds of Delphi surveys, the criteria for selecting areas using PRO were confirmed. After this process, in the clinical areas where ICHOM provides PRO measurement sets, an expert panel survey was conducted to determine five candidate PRO measurement areas. Subsequently, the final prioritized PRO measurement area was selected based on the selection criteria.Results: The selection criteria were composed of 3 categories and 8 items. First category, importance and feasibility, included (1) burden of disease, (2) Importance of PRO measurement and (3) degree of impact on patients' lives. Second category, feasibility, included (4) usability of existing PROMs, (5) possibility of self-report, (6) degree of clinical use, and (7) potential for use of existing projects. Third category, usability, included (8) the possibility of improving the quality of care. Among the areas with the set of PRO measures presented by the ICHOM, hip and knee replacement received high scores in selection criteria excluding the burden of disease.Conclusion: This study provides information on areas of clinical practice where the introduction of PRO is feasible. The implementation of PRO will assist in the efforts to improve the quality of care in healthcare institutions by providing patient-centered outcome data. Also, PRO enables comparisons of outcome data by healthcare providers and provides information to policy makers for improving performance for patients.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Quality Improvement in Health Care
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14371/qih.2025.31.1.15
Primary Topic
Delphi Technique in Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The selection of Priority Assessment Domains for Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes as National Quality Indicator in Korean Healthcare

Seol-Hee Chung, Seung‐Yong Jeong, Sohee Kim, Yeongchae Song
Quality Improvement in Health Care
Delphi Technique in Research
article

The selection of Priority Assessment Domains for Evaluating Patient-Reported Outcomes as National Quality Indicator in Korean Healthcare

Seol-Hee Chung, Seung‐Yong Jeong, Sohee Kim, Yeongchae Song
article en

Abstract

Purpose: The objective of this study is to develop criteria for selecting suitable areas for measuring PRO in the Korean healthcare system and to prioritize the domains based on these criteria for the PRO introduction.Methods: The study established criteria for prioritizing PRO areas using the RAND/UCLA modified Delphi method, which was conducted with nine experts. The expert group consisted of five academic and clinical experts, two members of the quality evaluation committee and two patient representatives. By conducting two rounds of Delphi surveys, the criteria for selecting areas using PRO were confirmed. After this process, in the clinical areas where ICHOM provides PRO measurement sets, an expert panel survey was conducted to determine five candidate PRO measurement areas. Subsequently, the final prioritized PRO measurement area was selected based on the selection criteria.Results: The selection criteria were composed of 3 categories and 8 items. First category, importance and feasibility, included (1) burden of disease, (2) Importance of PRO measurement and (3) degree of impact on patients' lives. Second category, feasibility, included (4) usability of existing PROMs, (5) possibility of self-report, (6) degree of clinical use, and (7) potential for use of existing projects. Third category, usability, included (8) the possibility of improving the quality of care. Among the areas with the set of PRO measures presented by the ICHOM, hip and knee replacement received high scores in selection criteria excluding the burden of disease.Conclusion: This study provides information on areas of clinical practice where the introduction of PRO is feasible. The implementation of PRO will assist in the efforts to improve the quality of care in healthcare institutions by providing patient-centered outcome data. Also, PRO enables comparisons of outcome data by healthcare providers and provides information to policy makers for improving performance for patients.

Quality Improvement in Health CareVol. 31(1)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Delphi Technique in Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.