Occupational risk of bloodborne infections among healthcare workers and strategies for their risk management

Aim. To identify occupational risks of bloodborne infections among healthcare workers in order to develop effective risk management strategies. Materials and methods. Investigation reports and incident records were analyzed for 3,256 occupational exposure events involving healthcare workers in Sverdlovsk Region from 2013 to 2023. Results . From 2013 to 2023, the incidence rate of blood exposure incidents among healthcare workers was 6.6 per 1,000 (95% CI: 6.1– 7.1). The risk varied depending on the type of medical department, the nature of medical procedures, job role, length of professional experience, day of the week, and time of day. The highest risk of occupational infection was observed among surgeons, traumatologists, obstetrician-gynecologists, anesthesiologists-resuscitators, nurses performing invasive procedures, and staff involved in medical waste collection and transportation. Incidents most commonly occurred during surgeries, injections, and waste handling. The most frequent injury type was hand needlestick injury (81.6%), with 72.3% caused by injection needles. On average, 44.1% of incidents posed a moderate risk of HIV or viral hepatitis transmission, and 9.2% carried a high risk. Post-exposure antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV was provided to 91.0% of those who required it. Of the healthcare workers, those at the highest risk of contracting blood-borne infections were surgeons and traumatologists, obstetricians and gynecologists, anesthesiologists and resuscitators, nurses performing invasive procedures, and employees involved in the collection and transportation of medical waste. Emergencies most often occurred during surgical interventions, injections, and when working with medical waste. By the nature of the traumatic factor, hand pricks were predominant (81.6%), including 72.3% with injection needles. On average, 44.1% of emergency situations were associated with a moderate risk of HIV and viral hepatitis infection, and 9.2% with a high risk. Coverage of post-exposure antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection among all employees who needed it was 91.0%. Conclusion. The analysis of blood exposure incidents is a critical tool for monitoring and managing occupational risks of bloodborne infections among healthcare workers. A comprehensive, multifaceted strategy is required to reduce the risk of injuries and infections.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Fundamental and Clinical Medicine
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23946/2500-0764-2025-10-2-32-43
Primary Topic
Infection Control in Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Occupational risk of bloodborne infections among healthcare workers and strategies for their risk management

А. С. Подымова, А. А. Голубкова, T. S. Yuzhanina, V. A. Kukarkina
3 links
Fundamental and Clinical Medicine
Infection Control in Healthcare
article

Occupational risk of bloodborne infections among healthcare workers and strategies for their risk management

А. С. Подымова, А. А. Голубкова, T. S. Yuzhanina, V. A. Kukarkina
article en

Abstract

Aim. To identify occupational risks of bloodborne infections among healthcare workers in order to develop effective risk management strategies. Materials and methods. Investigation reports and incident records were analyzed for 3,256 occupational exposure events involving healthcare workers in Sverdlovsk Region from 2013 to 2023. Results . From 2013 to 2023, the incidence rate of blood exposure incidents among healthcare workers was 6.6 per 1,000 (95% CI: 6.1– 7.1). The risk varied depending on the type of medical department, the nature of medical procedures, job role, length of professional experience, day of the week, and time of day. The highest risk of occupational infection was observed among surgeons, traumatologists, obstetrician-gynecologists, anesthesiologists-resuscitators, nurses performing invasive procedures, and staff involved in medical waste collection and transportation. Incidents most commonly occurred during surgeries, injections, and waste handling. The most frequent injury type was hand needlestick injury (81.6%), with 72.3% caused by injection needles. On average, 44.1% of incidents posed a moderate risk of HIV or viral hepatitis transmission, and 9.2% carried a high risk. Post-exposure antiretroviral prophylaxis for HIV was provided to 91.0% of those who required it. Of the healthcare workers, those at the highest risk of contracting blood-borne infections were surgeons and traumatologists, obstetricians and gynecologists, anesthesiologists and resuscitators, nurses performing invasive procedures, and employees involved in the collection and transportation of medical waste. Emergencies most often occurred during surgical interventions, injections, and when working with medical waste. By the nature of the traumatic factor, hand pricks were predominant (81.6%), including 72.3% with injection needles. On average, 44.1% of emergency situations were associated with a moderate risk of HIV and viral hepatitis infection, and 9.2% with a high risk. Coverage of post-exposure antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection among all employees who needed it was 91.0%. Conclusion. The analysis of blood exposure incidents is a critical tool for monitoring and managing occupational risks of bloodborne infections among healthcare workers. A comprehensive, multifaceted strategy is required to reduce the risk of injuries and infections.

Fundamental and Clinical MedicineVol. 10(2)
Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education (RU), Central Research Institute of Epidemiology (RU), Regional Center for Prevention and Control of AIDS and Infectious Diseases (RU), Federal Service for Surveillance on Consumer Rights Protection and Human Wellbeing (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Infection Control in Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.