One Nation, One Election: Towards Streamlined Governance and Electoral Reform

One Nation, One Election (ONOE) concept suggests coordinating the Lok Sabha and State Legislative Assemblies’ election cycles in India. The historical background, viability, and ramifications of holding simultaneous elections are examined in this study. The practice, which was in use from 1951 to 1967, was interrupted by administrative and political difficulties. The High-Level Committee’s proposals and recent debates draw attention to ONOE’s potential advantages, which include improved governance, less financial strain, policy continuity, and less socioeconomic upheavals. Using information from stakeholder, expert, and public consultations, the report critically analyses constitutional, logistical, and political factors. This study highlights the transformative potential of ONOE as a crucial electoral reform for India by resolving issues over regional representation and democratic integrity. Legal and constitutional challenges that call for changes to Articles 75, 83, 85, 172, 174, and 356 are carefully examined for their effects on the federal system and parliamentary governance. In light of the Ramnath Kovind Committee Report’s Terms of Reference, the report proposes a nuanced approach based on international experiences in nations including South Africa, Sweden, Germany, and Indonesia. It comes to the conclusion that ONOE urges careful consideration and agreement from all parties involved, cautioning against jeopardizing the standard and vitality of India’s democracy. This study highlights the revolutionary potential of ONOE as a crucial electoral reform for India, aiming to improve democratic efficiency and streamline government by resolving concerns regarding regional representation and democratic integrity.