Comparison of Simulation Results for Two Types of Induction Motors Using Conventional and Variable Speed Drives

This paper comprehensively compares simulation results for two distinct types of induction motors: wound rotor motors and squirrel cage motors. Both motor types are assessed under identical operating conditions, rated explicitly at 2750 kW, 6.6 kV, and 50 Hz. The study aims to evaluate and analyse two different control methodologies. The first control method employs a conventional approach involving fixed-speed operation and standard control techniques. The second method used an advanced variable-frequency drive system. It removed all the direct online equipment, allowing dynamic motor speed adjustment and improved performance for the second proposed control method. The torque improvement by the second method is more than 20%, and the starting current is very low (there is no inrush current), which saves money. Through detailed simulations, this research highlights the differences in efficiency, torque characteristics, and overall operational effectiveness between these two motor types and their respective control strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kerbala Journal for Engineering Sciences
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63463/kjes1176
Primary Topic
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of Simulation Results for Two Types of Induction Motors Using Conventional and Variable Speed Drives

Wadah A Aljaism
Kerbala Journal for Engineering Sciences
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
article

Comparison of Simulation Results for Two Types of Induction Motors Using Conventional and Variable Speed Drives

Wadah A Aljaism
article en

Abstract

This paper comprehensively compares simulation results for two distinct types of induction motors: wound rotor motors and squirrel cage motors. Both motor types are assessed under identical operating conditions, rated explicitly at 2750 kW, 6.6 kV, and 50 Hz. The study aims to evaluate and analyse two different control methodologies. The first control method employs a conventional approach involving fixed-speed operation and standard control techniques. The second method used an advanced variable-frequency drive system. It removed all the direct online equipment, allowing dynamic motor speed adjustment and improved performance for the second proposed control method. The torque improvement by the second method is more than 20%, and the starting current is very low (there is no inrush current), which saves money. Through detailed simulations, this research highlights the differences in efficiency, torque characteristics, and overall operational effectiveness between these two motor types and their respective control strategies.

Kerbala Journal for Engineering Sciences
Hue University (VN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 86%
Electric Motor Design and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.