Comparison of the flexibility of standard Salesforce components and custom components in Lightning Web Components

In modern business environments, flexibility and adaptability in customer relationship management solutions are increasingly important. This study examines the flexibility of Salesforce’s standard components compared to custom-developed components in Lightning Web Components by assessing each type’s customization and adaptability to business-specific needs. The research sets forth three primary hypotheses: that custom components are more adaptable to unique business requirements, that custom components enhance user satisfaction through better interface adaptation, and that they provide improved responsiveness across various devices. The methodology involved A/B testing with two groups, each evaluating either standard or custom Salesforce components on desktop and mobile devices. The evaluation focused on four flexibility metrics: CSS customizability, responsiveness, parameter flexibility, and user acceptability. Data collection included code analysis, component behavior observations, and user surveys. Findings indicate a significant flexibility advantage for custom components across all measured characteristics, confirming the hypotheses. In conclusion, the research demonstrates that custom components offer substantial flexibility benefits over standard components, particularly in enhancing user satisfaction and adaptability. These results suggest custom components are valuable for enterprises requiring high adaptability in their Salesforce solutions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.7101
Primary Topic
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparison of the flexibility of standard Salesforce components and custom components in Lightning Web Components

Marek Miłosz, Tomasz Olszewski, Klaudia Parczyńska
1 links
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
article

Comparison of the flexibility of standard Salesforce components and custom components in Lightning Web Components

Marek Miłosz, Tomasz Olszewski, Klaudia Parczyńska
article en

Abstract

In modern business environments, flexibility and adaptability in customer relationship management solutions are increasingly important. This study examines the flexibility of Salesforce’s standard components compared to custom-developed components in Lightning Web Components by assessing each type’s customization and adaptability to business-specific needs. The research sets forth three primary hypotheses: that custom components are more adaptable to unique business requirements, that custom components enhance user satisfaction through better interface adaptation, and that they provide improved responsiveness across various devices. The methodology involved A/B testing with two groups, each evaluating either standard or custom Salesforce components on desktop and mobile devices. The evaluation focused on four flexibility metrics: CSS customizability, responsiveness, parameter flexibility, and user acceptability. Data collection included code analysis, component behavior observations, and user surveys. Findings indicate a significant flexibility advantage for custom components across all measured characteristics, confirming the hypotheses. In conclusion, the research demonstrates that custom components offer substantial flexibility benefits over standard components, particularly in enhancing user satisfaction and adaptability. These results suggest custom components are valuable for enterprises requiring high adaptability in their Salesforce solutions.

Journal of Computer Sciences InstituteVol. 35
Lublin University of Technology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 73%
Business Process Modeling and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.