Performance comparison of CRUD operations in Spring Boot and ASP.NET Core frameworks

This article analyzes the performance of CRUD operations in two popular frameworks: Spring Boot and ASP.NET Core, evaluating speed, efficiency, and resource usage. Performance tests revealed that ASP.NET Core excels in CPU-intensive tasks, making it more suitable for applications requiring high computational efficiency. In contrast, Spring Boot offers more stable memory usage and better handling of complex queries, making it ideal for resource-constrained systems. The findings indicate that the choice of technology should depend on project requirements, and the paper provides practical guidance for optimizing the development of scalable applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35784/jcsi.7198
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.49
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Performance comparison of CRUD operations in Spring Boot and ASP.NET Core frameworks

Marek Miłosz, Michał Grzeszuk
1 citations
Journal of Computer Sciences Institute
Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
1.49
article

Performance comparison of CRUD operations in Spring Boot and ASP.NET Core frameworks

Marek Miłosz, Michał Grzeszuk
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This article analyzes the performance of CRUD operations in two popular frameworks: Spring Boot and ASP.NET Core, evaluating speed, efficiency, and resource usage. Performance tests revealed that ASP.NET Core excels in CPU-intensive tasks, making it more suitable for applications requiring high computational efficiency. In contrast, Spring Boot offers more stable memory usage and better handling of complex queries, making it ideal for resource-constrained systems. The findings indicate that the choice of technology should depend on project requirements, and the paper provides practical guidance for optimizing the development of scalable applications.

Journal of Computer Sciences InstituteVol. 35
Lublin University of Technology (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Distributed and Parallel Computing Systems
1.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.