Fightin’ words in Pauline texts:Their polemical appropriation in modern political discourse

The politicisation of biblical language has become more acute with the rise of Christian nationalism and right-wing movements in many countries. This article explores the American political scene and its rhetorical appropriation of biblical language. Fightin’ words drawn from presumed Pauline texts, have become staple rhetoric among candidates seeking to attract Christian voters to their cause. The article then discusses the use of such discourse by Republican and Democrat politicians in recent decades. Next, it attempts to reduce, if possible, combative speech by examining three verses: 1 Timothy 1:18, 6:12, and 2 Timothy 4:7. It asks whether Bible translators have accurately conveyed the Greek text of these verses in English. The article argues that modern translations have overlooked the contextual meaning and lexical background found in the material culture of the Graeco-Roman world. It is hoped that the proposed new translations will produce less toxic debate in future political discourse.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Acta Theologica
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.38140/at.v45i1.9518
Primary Topic
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fightin’ words in Pauline texts:Their polemical appropriation in modern political discourse

1 links
Acta Theologica
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
article

Fightin’ words in Pauline texts:Their polemical appropriation in modern political discourse

article en

Abstract

The politicisation of biblical language has become more acute with the rise of Christian nationalism and right-wing movements in many countries. This article explores the American political scene and its rhetorical appropriation of biblical language. Fightin’ words drawn from presumed Pauline texts, have become staple rhetoric among candidates seeking to attract Christian voters to their cause. The article then discusses the use of such discourse by Republican and Democrat politicians in recent decades. Next, it attempts to reduce, if possible, combative speech by examining three verses: 1 Timothy 1:18, 6:12, and 2 Timothy 4:7. It asks whether Bible translators have accurately conveyed the Greek text of these verses in English. The article argues that modern translations have overlooked the contextual meaning and lexical background found in the material culture of the Graeco-Roman world. It is hoped that the proposed new translations will produce less toxic debate in future political discourse.

Acta TheologicaVol. 45(1)
University of South Africa (ZA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 87%
Biblical Studies and Interpretation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.