Galaxy Zoo CEERS: Bar Fractions Up to <i>z</i> ∼ 4.0

Abstract We study the evolution of the bar fraction in disk galaxies between 0.5 &lt; z &lt; 4.0 using multiband colored images from JWST Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science Survey (CEERS). These images were classified by citizen scientists in a new phase of the Galaxy Zoo (GZ) project called GZ CEERS. Citizen scientists were asked whether a strong or weak bar was visible in the host galaxy. After considering multiple corrections for observational biases, we find that the bar fraction decreases with redshift in our volume-limited sample ( n = 398); from <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>6</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> % at 0.5 &lt; z &lt; 1.0 to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>6</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> % at 3.0 &lt; z &lt; 4.0. However, we argue it is appropriate to interpret these fractions as lower limits. Disentangling real changes in the bar fraction from detection biases remains challenging. Nevertheless, we find a significant number of bars up to z = 2.5. This implies that disks are dynamically cool or baryon dominated, enabling them to host bars. This also suggests that bar-driven secular evolution likely plays an important role at higher redshifts. When we distinguish between strong and weak bars, we find that the weak bar fraction decreases with increasing redshift. In contrast, the strong bar fraction is constant between 0.5 &lt; z &lt; 2.5. This implies that the strong bars found in this work are robust long-lived structures, unless the rate of bar destruction is similar to the rate of bar formation. Finally, our results are consistent with disk instabilities being the dominant mode of bar formation at lower redshifts, while bar formation through interactions and mergers is more common at higher redshifts.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Astrophysical Journal
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/add7d0
Citations
17
Primary Topic
Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
19.63

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Galaxy Zoo CEERS: Bar Fractions Up to z ∼ 4.0

David O’Ryan, Ray A. Lucas, H. L. Roberts, Rimpei Chiba et al.
17 citations
The Astrophysical Journal
Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology
19.63
article

Galaxy Zoo CEERS: Bar Fractions Up to z ∼ 4.0

David O’Ryan, Ray A. Lucas, H. L. Roberts, Rimpei Chiba, Tobias Géron, Shardha Jogee, Fabio Pacucci, Kameswara Bharadwaj Mantha, Luca Costantin, L. Fortson, Anton M. Koekemoer, Francesca Fragkoudi, Sandor Kruk, Brooke Simmons, Antonello Calabrò, Benne W. Holwerda, Chris Lintott, H. J. Dickinson, Rebecca Smethurst, Izzy L. Garland, Mike Walmsley, Karen L. Masters, M. R. Drout, Yuchen Guo, Jason Shingirai Makechemu
article en
17 citations

Abstract

Abstract We study the evolution of the bar fraction in disk galaxies between 0.5 &lt; z &lt; 4.0 using multiband colored images from JWST Cosmic Evolution Early Release Science Survey (CEERS). These images were classified by citizen scientists in a new phase of the Galaxy Zoo (GZ) project called GZ CEERS. Citizen scientists were asked whether a strong or weak bar was visible in the host galaxy. After considering multiple corrections for observational biases, we find that the bar fraction decreases with redshift in our volume-limited sample ( n = 398); from <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:mn>2</mml:mn> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>4</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>6</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> % at 0.5 &lt; z &lt; 1.0 to <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" overflow="scroll"> <mml:msubsup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>3</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>1</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>+</mml:mo> <mml:mn>6</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msubsup> </mml:math> % at 3.0 &lt; z &lt; 4.0. However, we argue it is appropriate to interpret these fractions as lower limits. Disentangling real changes in the bar fraction from detection biases remains challenging. Nevertheless, we find a significant number of bars up to z = 2.5. This implies that disks are dynamically cool or baryon dominated, enabling them to host bars. This also suggests that bar-driven secular evolution likely plays an important role at higher redshifts. When we distinguish between strong and weak bars, we find that the weak bar fraction decreases with increasing redshift. In contrast, the strong bar fraction is constant between 0.5 &lt; z &lt; 2.5. This implies that the strong bars found in this work are robust long-lived structures, unless the rate of bar destruction is similar to the rate of bar formation. Finally, our results are consistent with disk instabilities being the dominant mode of bar formation at lower redshifts, while bar formation through interactions and mergers is more common at higher redshifts.

The Astrophysical JournalVol. 987(1)
National Science Foundation, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, UK Research and Innovation, Royal Astronomical Society, Canada Research Chairs, Grantová Agentura České Republiky, University of Toronto, Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación, Fundación Bancaria Caixa d'Estalvis i Pensions de Barcelona, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, European Regional Development Fund, Agencia Estatal de Investigación
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Radio Astronomy Observations and Technology
19.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.