Contradictions in Gender Inclusivity and Discrimination: Experiencing the Paradoxical Workplace in the Philippines

ABSTRACT This paper examines the experiences and circumstances of queer employees in the Philippine labor market. Drawing from focus group discussions among self‐identified LGBTQI+ Filipino workers in various formal sectors and key informant interviews with experts on gender inclusion and labor policies, this study finds that formal policies may promote inclusivity in the workplace, but underlying norms, biases, and practices perpetuating discrimination and exclusion can undermine these policies. As a result, employees may experience both affirmation and invalidation at the same time. I refer to this phenomenon as a “paradoxical workplace,” which pertains to environments where conflicting dynamics of support and discrimination coexist in terms of workplace policy and practice. This study finds that the contradiction in these workplaces is skewed towards being more constraining than enabling. Finally, this paper showcases the need to ensure that policy and practice align in promoting gender inclusivity and terminating discrimination in the workplace.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sexuality Gender & Policy
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/sgp2.70014
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contradictions in Gender Inclusivity and Discrimination: Experiencing the Paradoxical Workplace in the Philippines

Athena Charanne R Presto
2 citations
Sexuality Gender & Policy
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
7.73
article

Contradictions in Gender Inclusivity and Discrimination: Experiencing the Paradoxical Workplace in the Philippines

Athena Charanne R Presto
article en
2 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper examines the experiences and circumstances of queer employees in the Philippine labor market. Drawing from focus group discussions among self‐identified LGBTQI+ Filipino workers in various formal sectors and key informant interviews with experts on gender inclusion and labor policies, this study finds that formal policies may promote inclusivity in the workplace, but underlying norms, biases, and practices perpetuating discrimination and exclusion can undermine these policies. As a result, employees may experience both affirmation and invalidation at the same time. I refer to this phenomenon as a “paradoxical workplace,” which pertains to environments where conflicting dynamics of support and discrimination coexist in terms of workplace policy and practice. This study finds that the contradiction in these workplaces is skewed towards being more constraining than enabling. Finally, this paper showcases the need to ensure that policy and practice align in promoting gender inclusivity and terminating discrimination in the workplace.

Sexuality Gender & PolicyVol. 8(3)
Australian National University (AU), University of the Philippines Diliman (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
7.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.