Evaluating Practicum Performance in ELT: Multi-Stakeholder Perspectives and Implications for Teacher Development

Teaching practicum and its evaluation in language teacher education programs is a complex and multi-faceted phenomenon. This study investigated multiple perspectives on performance evaluation during the teaching practicum in an English Language Teacher Training Program by examining perspectives of university supervisors, cooperating teachers, peers, and the student teachers themselves. Utilizing a 45-item observation checklist and a combination of quantitative and qualitative analyses, findings revealed significant variance in evaluations across groups, with cooperating teachers providing the highest ratings. Interviews and group discussions highlight that while the checklist aids structured assessment, modifications are needed to accommodate diverse teaching contexts. Peer assessment and self-assessment were valued for fostering professional growth, though concerns about objectivity arose when linked to grading. The study suggests refining assessment tools, promoting reflective practices, and training evaluators to improve practicum experiences and support future teachers’ development.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4995/head25.2025.19991
Primary Topic
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating Practicum Performance in ELT: Multi-Stakeholder Perspectives and Implications for Teacher Development

Ali Merç
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
article

Evaluating Practicum Performance in ELT: Multi-Stakeholder Perspectives and Implications for Teacher Development

Ali Merç
article en

Abstract

Teaching practicum and its evaluation in language teacher education programs is a complex and multi-faceted phenomenon. This study investigated multiple perspectives on performance evaluation during the teaching practicum in an English Language Teacher Training Program by examining perspectives of university supervisors, cooperating teachers, peers, and the student teachers themselves. Utilizing a 45-item observation checklist and a combination of quantitative and qualitative analyses, findings revealed significant variance in evaluations across groups, with cooperating teachers providing the highest ratings. Interviews and group discussions highlight that while the checklist aids structured assessment, modifications are needed to accommodate diverse teaching contexts. Peer assessment and self-assessment were valued for fostering professional growth, though concerns about objectivity arose when linked to grading. The study suggests refining assessment tools, promoting reflective practices, and training evaluators to improve practicum experiences and support future teachers’ development.

Anadolu University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evaluating Practicum Performance in ELT: Multi-Stakeholder Perspectives and Implications for Teacher Development — Ali Merç · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS