Who supports or opposes the use of AI in educational and scientific contexts? An analysis of the role that knowledge and attitude has on the perception of the appropriateness of AI-use within the Austrian population

In this article we investigate in how far participants of an Austrian population survey (n=2302, summer 2024) deem the AI-use in the school and research contexts as appropriate. The data was collected via an online-access-panel survey on digital skills and competences, with a special focus on attitudes towards and knowledge on Artificial Intelligence. Participants had to indicate whether a specific scenario of AI use seems appropriate or inappropriate to them. Linear regression models on both – the school-related scenarios and the university/research-related scenarios – were calculated testing for effects of general technology commitment, digital competence, AI knowledge, experience and general attitude as well as controlled for socio demographics. Results show that socio demographics provide little, however surprising explanation for the assessment of the appropriateness of AI-use and attitudes and experience (in particular concerning AI) only partly do matter.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4995/head25.2025.20147
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.37
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who supports or opposes the use of AI in educational and scientific contexts? An analysis of the role that knowledge and attitude has on the perception of the appropriateness of AI-use within the Austrian population

Dimitri Prandner, Manuela Gruenangerl
1 citations
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
article

Who supports or opposes the use of AI in educational and scientific contexts? An analysis of the role that knowledge and attitude has on the perception of the appropriateness of AI-use within the Austrian population

Dimitri Prandner, Manuela Gruenangerl
article en
1 citations

Abstract

In this article we investigate in how far participants of an Austrian population survey (n=2302, summer 2024) deem the AI-use in the school and research contexts as appropriate. The data was collected via an online-access-panel survey on digital skills and competences, with a special focus on attitudes towards and knowledge on Artificial Intelligence. Participants had to indicate whether a specific scenario of AI use seems appropriate or inappropriate to them. Linear regression models on both – the school-related scenarios and the university/research-related scenarios – were calculated testing for effects of general technology commitment, digital competence, AI knowledge, experience and general attitude as well as controlled for socio demographics. Results show that socio demographics provide little, however surprising explanation for the assessment of the appropriateness of AI-use and attitudes and experience (in particular concerning AI) only partly do matter.

University of Salzburg (AT), University of Arts and Industrial Design Linz (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
2.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Who supports or opposes the use of AI in educational and scientific contexts? An analysis of the role that knowledge and attitude has on the perception of the appropriateness of AI-use within the Austrian population — Dimitri Prandner, Manuela Gruenangerl · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS