Does Developing a Study Guide Impact Test Performance? A Comparison Between Unguided and Guided Development of Scientific Writing

The present study asked whether voluntarily developing a study guide for the final exam would be positively related to performance on the exam. It also asked whether the mode of study guide development (instructor-guided or unguided) would differentiate the performance of students who completed this task. In the study, the development of a study guide was one of the many curriculum-related activities that students could carry out in a course taught through instructor-guided inquiry-based learning. Because it was not a compulsory activity, 81% of the students completed it. Among these students, no differences were observed in the final grades of the instructor-guided and unguided conditions. However, across all participants, completing the study guide was linked to higher class participation and class grades. These findings suggest that participation in co-curricular activities is a reflection of engagement and desirable performance outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4995/head25.2025.19863
Primary Topic
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does Developing a Study Guide Impact Test Performance? A Comparison Between Unguided and Guided Development of Scientific Writing

Maryam Bojulaia, Huda Al Mulhem, Khadija El Alaoui, Arifi Waked et al.
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
article

Does Developing a Study Guide Impact Test Performance? A Comparison Between Unguided and Guided Development of Scientific Writing

Maryam Bojulaia, Huda Al Mulhem, Khadija El Alaoui, Arifi Waked, Maura Pilotti
article en

Abstract

The present study asked whether voluntarily developing a study guide for the final exam would be positively related to performance on the exam. It also asked whether the mode of study guide development (instructor-guided or unguided) would differentiate the performance of students who completed this task. In the study, the development of a study guide was one of the many curriculum-related activities that students could carry out in a course taught through instructor-guided inquiry-based learning. Because it was not a compulsory activity, 81% of the students completed it. Among these students, no differences were observed in the final grades of the instructor-guided and unguided conditions. However, across all participants, completing the study guide was linked to higher class participation and class grades. These findings suggest that participation in co-curricular activities is a reflection of engagement and desirable performance outcomes.

Prince Mohammad bin Fahd University (SA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Educational Assessment and Pedagogy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.