“Our Country”: Extractive Colonialism and Labor in the Essequibo Borderland

Abstract This article examines the long history of claims over the Essequibo territory (now the Venezuela-Guyana border), focused on the late nineteenth-century gold rush and the ensuing diplomatic battles that culminated in the boundary arbitration trial of 1899 that formally settled today's borders. Reading across British and Venezuelan sources, including travel accounts, newspapers, British Colonial Office records, and Venezuelan Ministry of the Interior documents, I argue that the advance of extractive capitalism into the Essequibo precipitated heightened battles over control of this territory. While the arbitration trial argued over colonial lineage, the border conflict, as this article shows, was rather made in everyday conflicts over labor and jurisdiction. In their encounter with this racialized borderlands, Venezuela and Britain solidified ideas about national borders and imperial governance, but these imaginaries of state power were constantly challenged by Black migrants and Indigenous residents whose mobilities and imaginaries could not be contained by the state.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Hispanic American Historical Review
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1215/00182168-11984546
Primary Topic
Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“Our Country”: Extractive Colonialism and Labor in the Essequibo Borderland

Joan Flores-Villalobos
Hispanic American Historical Review
Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
article

“Our Country”: Extractive Colonialism and Labor in the Essequibo Borderland

Joan Flores-Villalobos
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines the long history of claims over the Essequibo territory (now the Venezuela-Guyana border), focused on the late nineteenth-century gold rush and the ensuing diplomatic battles that culminated in the boundary arbitration trial of 1899 that formally settled today's borders. Reading across British and Venezuelan sources, including travel accounts, newspapers, British Colonial Office records, and Venezuelan Ministry of the Interior documents, I argue that the advance of extractive capitalism into the Essequibo precipitated heightened battles over control of this territory. While the arbitration trial argued over colonial lineage, the border conflict, as this article shows, was rather made in everyday conflicts over labor and jurisdiction. In their encounter with this racialized borderlands, Venezuela and Britain solidified ideas about national borders and imperial governance, but these imaginaries of state power were constantly challenged by Black migrants and Indigenous residents whose mobilities and imaginaries could not be contained by the state.

Hispanic American Historical ReviewVol. 105(4)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Migration, Ethnicity, and Economy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

“Our Country”: Extractive Colonialism and Labor in the Essequibo Borderland — Joan Flores-Villalobos · Hispanic American Historical Review (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS