CURE for Undergraduate Education: How Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) can scale innovative practices in STEM education and assessment

As part of a large effort to study educational innovation, we developed, implemented, and assessed the effectiveness of Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) across five large universities in the USA. We developed five semester-long STEM courses to offer undergraduates the opportunity to conduct cutting-edge and team-based original research projects. To assess the effectiveness of the CUREs in meeting overarching teaching and learning objectives, we conducted paired pre- and post- surveys of >2,500 undergraduate participants (including students in non-CURE control courses). We found statistically significant increases in interdisciplinary thinking, confidence in scientific skills, sense of science identity, intention to pursue STEM careers, and teamwork satisfaction. These gains were greater in CURE courses than in non-CURE control courses - and greater still for underrepresented minority and first-generation college student. We highlight the value of CUREs for increasing student engagement, belonging, and retention in STEM fields.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4995/head25.2025.19902
Primary Topic
Innovative Teaching Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

CURE for Undergraduate Education: How Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) can scale innovative practices in STEM education and assessment

H. Masching, Emily H. Le Sage, Nancy Kaufmann, Corinne L. Richards‐Zawacki et al.
Innovative Teaching Methods
article

CURE for Undergraduate Education: How Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) can scale innovative practices in STEM education and assessment

H. Masching, Emily H. Le Sage, Nancy Kaufmann, Corinne L. Richards‐Zawacki, Douglas C. Woodhams, Michel E. B. Ohmer, Allison Q. Byrne, Miranda M. Chen Musgrove, K. Liu, Louise A. Rollins‐Smith, Erica Bree Rosenblum
article en

Abstract

As part of a large effort to study educational innovation, we developed, implemented, and assessed the effectiveness of Course-based Undergraduate Research Experiences (CUREs) across five large universities in the USA. We developed five semester-long STEM courses to offer undergraduates the opportunity to conduct cutting-edge and team-based original research projects. To assess the effectiveness of the CUREs in meeting overarching teaching and learning objectives, we conducted paired pre- and post- surveys of >2,500 undergraduate participants (including students in non-CURE control courses). We found statistically significant increases in interdisciplinary thinking, confidence in scientific skills, sense of science identity, intention to pursue STEM careers, and teamwork satisfaction. These gains were greater in CURE courses than in non-CURE control courses - and greater still for underrepresented minority and first-generation college student. We highlight the value of CUREs for increasing student engagement, belonging, and retention in STEM fields.

Vanderbilt University (US), Skidmore College (US), Edwards (United Kingdom) (GB), University of Massachusetts Boston (US), University of Mississippi (US), University of California, Berkeley (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Innovative Teaching Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.