Guidelines to Assist in Autism Diagnostic Assessments with Females: A Delphi Study

Purpose: While growing evidence highlights the challenges faced by autistic females during diagnostic assessments, it remains unclear how well this research is applied in clinical practice. This study aimed to gather consensus among clinicians on recommendations for autism assessments to improve diagnostic validity for cis-gendered females. Method: A three-round Delphi study was conducted with registered healthcare professionals experienced in conducting autism diagnostic assessments with females. Results: Thematic analysis of Round 1 responses identified five themes: Attributes of the Assessor, Post-Clinical Qualification Education and Learning, Diagnostic Tools, Questions Asked, and Sources of Information. These themes produced 28 statements evaluated in Rounds 2 and 3. Eighteen reached 80% consensus in the final round. Experts emphasized the important of assessors having strong knowledge of research into autism in women, co-occurring conditions, other developmental conditions, and masking. Ongoing professional development on autism in women was considered essential and it was recommended that new assessors shadow female assessments. Experts agreed the ADOS-2 is not always useful for females, whereas screening tools can provide valuable narrative insights, though these need to be interpreted carefully due to potential male bias. Experts supported including more prompts to explore subtle differences in social communication and repetitive patterns of behaviour and stressed the importance of masking behaviours and experiences across different relationships. Masking should also be considered when interpreting informant information. Conclusions: Findings reveal inconsistencies in how clinicians consider sex-related factors in autism assessments, highlighting the need for formal guidance. The next steps will be to develop this guidance, incorporating research evidence, the perspectives of autistic women and girls, and Delphi results. This aims to improve the experience, and accuracy of diagnosis for girls and women undergoing autism assessment, increasing consistency across services, and supporting clinicians.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Autism in Adulthood
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/aut.2024.0325
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.43
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Guidelines to Assist in Autism Diagnostic Assessments with Females: A Delphi Study

Phoebe Morris, Verity Chester, Grace Trundle, Zoe Alexander et al.
1 citations
Autism in Adulthood
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
1.43
article

Guidelines to Assist in Autism Diagnostic Assessments with Females: A Delphi Study

Phoebe Morris, Verity Chester, Grace Trundle, Zoe Alexander, Indigo Crump
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Purpose: While growing evidence highlights the challenges faced by autistic females during diagnostic assessments, it remains unclear how well this research is applied in clinical practice. This study aimed to gather consensus among clinicians on recommendations for autism assessments to improve diagnostic validity for cis-gendered females. Method: A three-round Delphi study was conducted with registered healthcare professionals experienced in conducting autism diagnostic assessments with females. Results: Thematic analysis of Round 1 responses identified five themes: Attributes of the Assessor, Post-Clinical Qualification Education and Learning, Diagnostic Tools, Questions Asked, and Sources of Information. These themes produced 28 statements evaluated in Rounds 2 and 3. Eighteen reached 80% consensus in the final round. Experts emphasized the important of assessors having strong knowledge of research into autism in women, co-occurring conditions, other developmental conditions, and masking. Ongoing professional development on autism in women was considered essential and it was recommended that new assessors shadow female assessments. Experts agreed the ADOS-2 is not always useful for females, whereas screening tools can provide valuable narrative insights, though these need to be interpreted carefully due to potential male bias. Experts supported including more prompts to explore subtle differences in social communication and repetitive patterns of behaviour and stressed the importance of masking behaviours and experiences across different relationships. Masking should also be considered when interpreting informant information. Conclusions: Findings reveal inconsistencies in how clinicians consider sex-related factors in autism assessments, highlighting the need for formal guidance. The next steps will be to develop this guidance, incorporating research evidence, the perspectives of autistic women and girls, and Delphi results. This aims to improve the experience, and accuracy of diagnosis for girls and women undergoing autism assessment, increasing consistency across services, and supporting clinicians.

Autism in Adulthood
Hertfordshire Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Birmingham and Solihull Mental Health NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Mental Health Foundation (GB), St Andrew's Healthcare (GB), Northamptonshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
1.43
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.