Identifiability, as a Data Risk: Is a Uniform Approach to Anonymisation About to Emerge in the EU?

Abstract The concept of identifiability remains a foundational yet contentious criterion in European Union (EU) data protection law. Similarly, anonymisation has sparked intense debate. This paper examines recent developments that have shaped the EU’s approaches to identifiability and anonymisation, including trends in the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) case law, national supervisory authority (SA) assessments of anonymisation processes, and the recent European Data Protection Board (EDPB) Opinion 28/2024 addressing the anonymity of artificial intelligence models and EDPB Guidelines 01/2025 on pseudonymisation. The paper explores how the balance between over-inclusiveness and under-inclusiveness is being calibrated, suggesting the emergence of a functional definition of personal data in CJEU case law. It underscores the importance of the burden of proof in evaluating anonymisation processes, as confirmed by national SA assessments. Finally, it highlights how to ensure consistency between the GDPR and data sharing mandates stemming from the new generation of EU data regulations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Risk Regulation
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2025.16
Primary Topic
European and International Law Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifiability, as a Data Risk: Is a Uniform Approach to Anonymisation About to Emerge in the EU?

Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon
European Journal of Risk Regulation
European and International Law Studies
article

Identifiability, as a Data Risk: Is a Uniform Approach to Anonymisation About to Emerge in the EU?

Sophie Stalla-Bourdillon
article en

Abstract

Abstract The concept of identifiability remains a foundational yet contentious criterion in European Union (EU) data protection law. Similarly, anonymisation has sparked intense debate. This paper examines recent developments that have shaped the EU’s approaches to identifiability and anonymisation, including trends in the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) case law, national supervisory authority (SA) assessments of anonymisation processes, and the recent European Data Protection Board (EDPB) Opinion 28/2024 addressing the anonymity of artificial intelligence models and EDPB Guidelines 01/2025 on pseudonymisation. The paper explores how the balance between over-inclusiveness and under-inclusiveness is being calibrated, suggesting the emergence of a functional definition of personal data in CJEU case law. It underscores the importance of the burden of proof in evaluating anonymisation processes, as confirmed by national SA assessments. Finally, it highlights how to ensure consistency between the GDPR and data sharing mandates stemming from the new generation of EU data regulations.

European Journal of Risk RegulationVol. 16(4)
Victoria University of Bangladesh (BD)
University of Cambridge
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
European and International Law Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.