Reliabilityand validity of the medicine ball throw test in children and adolescents

The purpose of this study was to investigate the evidence regarding the reliability and validity of the medicine ball throw test when applied to children and adolescents. Systematic search was conducted in four electronic databases (Scopus, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and MEDLINE/PubMed) from their inception until November 2024. The meta-analysis of relative inter-session reliability synthesized data from nine studies using the intraclass correlation coefficient (n=293) and identified good test-retest reliability for the medicine ball throw test (ICC: 0.80; 95%CI [0.72-0.86]). When analysed separately, the standing chest medicine ball throw test (four studies; n=129) demonstrated fair test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.72; 95%CI [0.58-0.83]), while the seated chest medicine ball throw test (three studies; n=193) exhibited good test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.84; 95%CI [0.48-0.96]). Only three studies examined the relationship between the medicine ball throw test and other fitness measures. Various protocols are used to administer the medicine ball throw test in children and adolescents, with the seated chest medicine ball throw test proving to be particularly reliable due to its strong relative reliability. Although the medicine ball throw test demonstrates acceptable reliability, the limited investigation into its validity, particularly criterion validity, hinders definitive protocol recommendations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Kinesiology
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.26582/k.57.1.11
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
12.04
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliabilityand validity of the medicine ball throw test in children and adolescents

Carlos Ayán, Daniel González-Devesa, Silvia Varela, José Carlos Diz-Gómez et al.
6 citations
Kinesiology
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
12.04
article

Reliabilityand validity of the medicine ball throw test in children and adolescents

Carlos Ayán, Daniel González-Devesa, Silvia Varela, José Carlos Diz-Gómez, Diego López-Amoedo
article en
6 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to investigate the evidence regarding the reliability and validity of the medicine ball throw test when applied to children and adolescents. Systematic search was conducted in four electronic databases (Scopus, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and MEDLINE/PubMed) from their inception until November 2024. The meta-analysis of relative inter-session reliability synthesized data from nine studies using the intraclass correlation coefficient (n=293) and identified good test-retest reliability for the medicine ball throw test (ICC: 0.80; 95%CI [0.72-0.86]). When analysed separately, the standing chest medicine ball throw test (four studies; n=129) demonstrated fair test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.72; 95%CI [0.58-0.83]), while the seated chest medicine ball throw test (three studies; n=193) exhibited good test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.84; 95%CI [0.48-0.96]). Only three studies examined the relationship between the medicine ball throw test and other fitness measures. Various protocols are used to administer the medicine ball throw test in children and adolescents, with the seated chest medicine ball throw test proving to be particularly reliable due to its strong relative reliability. Although the medicine ball throw test demonstrates acceptable reliability, the limited investigation into its validity, particularly criterion validity, hinders definitive protocol recommendations.

KinesiologyVol. 57(1)
Catholic University of Ávila (ES), Galicia Sur Biomedical Foundation (ES), Servicio Gallego de Salud (ES), Universidade de Vigo (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Shoulder Injury and Treatment
12.04
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.