Trash headlines: media portrayal of risks, response measures, and partisan differences in news coverage of space junk

As a recently emergent issue, public familiarity with orbital debris is likely low, and therefore especially susceptible to the influence of news media representations. To better understand media representations of orbital debris issues, a content analysis of all orbital debris news articles (N = 207) across four major U.S. media outlets (2011 – 2022) was conducted. It examines portrayals of risks associated with orbital debris, response measures, and terminology choices. Despite evidence that risks to satellite services are most consequential to everyday civilians, this risk was not a leading theme in any article. Instead, risks associated with falling debris to Earth was the most frequent leading theme across all news outlets. We also found differences across partisan outlets, including greater attention to space sustainability/safety risks and mitigation in a liberal outlet compared with a conservative outlet. Linguistically, the more colloquial “space junk” was more prominent than the more jargon-y “orbital debris.”

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Science Communication
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.22323/151320250630102925
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trash headlines: media portrayal of risks, response measures, and partisan differences in news coverage of space junk

Patrice Kohl, Brendan Byrne, Bridget Rubenking
Journal of Science Communication
Media Studies and Communication
article

Trash headlines: media portrayal of risks, response measures, and partisan differences in news coverage of space junk

Patrice Kohl, Brendan Byrne, Bridget Rubenking
article en

Abstract

As a recently emergent issue, public familiarity with orbital debris is likely low, and therefore especially susceptible to the influence of news media representations. To better understand media representations of orbital debris issues, a content analysis of all orbital debris news articles (N = 207) across four major U.S. media outlets (2011 – 2022) was conducted. It examines portrayals of risks associated with orbital debris, response measures, and terminology choices. Despite evidence that risks to satellite services are most consequential to everyday civilians, this risk was not a leading theme in any article. Instead, risks associated with falling debris to Earth was the most frequent leading theme across all news outlets. We also found differences across partisan outlets, including greater attention to space sustainability/safety risks and mitigation in a liberal outlet compared with a conservative outlet. Linguistically, the more colloquial “space junk” was more prominent than the more jargon-y “orbital debris.”

Journal of Science CommunicationVol. 24(03)
Purchase College (US), University of Central Florida (US), SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Trash headlines: media portrayal of risks, response measures, and partisan differences in news coverage of space junk — Patrice Kohl, Brendan Byrne, et al. · Journal of Science Communication (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS