Political Economy Analysis of Decentralisation, Local Governance, and Development in Ghana

Decentralisation has been a cornerstone of Ghana’s governance and development strategy since the 1980s, aimed at enhancing local governance, participatory democracy, and equitable development. This paper conducts a political economy analysis (PEA) of decentralisation in Ghana, examining how power dynamics, institutional structures, and socio-economic factors shape its implementation and outcomes. Using an exploratory case study design, the data was drawn from policy documents, government reports, and secondary literature, The paper explores the interplay between political actors, traditional authorities, and local government institutions in the decentralisation process. Findings reveal that while Ghana’s decentralisation framework is robust on paper, its effectiveness is undermined by political interference, limited fiscal devolution, and capacity constraints at the local level. Elite capture and partisan politics often distort resource allocation, weakening accountability and service delivery. Additionally, traditional authorities retain significant influence, sometimes conflicting with formal local governance structures. Despite these challenges, decentralisation has contributed to increased citizen participation and localized development initiatives in some regions. The key conclusion is that the paper identifies innovative countermeasures like a hybrid governance model that integrates traditional chiefs with elected officials. These finding challenges conventional decentralisation theories, emphasising the need for context-sensitive reforms that address Ghana’s unique political and socio-economic development realities. The paper concludes that for decentralisation to achieve its intended goals, reforms must address fiscal autonomy, strengthen institutional capacity, and minimize political manipulation. A more inclusive governance approach, integrating traditional and formal systems, could enhance legitimacy and development outcomes. This paper contributes to broader debates on the political economy of decentralisation in sub-Saharan Africa, offering policy recommendations for improving local governance and sustainable development in Ghana.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Modern Economy
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4236/me.2025.166044
Primary Topic
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Political Economy Analysis of Decentralisation, Local Governance, and Development in Ghana

Gbensuglo Alidu Bukari, Katherine Kauza-Nu-Dem Millar, Musah Ibrahim Mordzeh-Ekpampo
Modern Economy
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
article

Political Economy Analysis of Decentralisation, Local Governance, and Development in Ghana

Gbensuglo Alidu Bukari, Katherine Kauza-Nu-Dem Millar, Musah Ibrahim Mordzeh-Ekpampo
article en

Abstract

Decentralisation has been a cornerstone of Ghana’s governance and development strategy since the 1980s, aimed at enhancing local governance, participatory democracy, and equitable development. This paper conducts a political economy analysis (PEA) of decentralisation in Ghana, examining how power dynamics, institutional structures, and socio-economic factors shape its implementation and outcomes. Using an exploratory case study design, the data was drawn from policy documents, government reports, and secondary literature, The paper explores the interplay between political actors, traditional authorities, and local government institutions in the decentralisation process. Findings reveal that while Ghana’s decentralisation framework is robust on paper, its effectiveness is undermined by political interference, limited fiscal devolution, and capacity constraints at the local level. Elite capture and partisan politics often distort resource allocation, weakening accountability and service delivery. Additionally, traditional authorities retain significant influence, sometimes conflicting with formal local governance structures. Despite these challenges, decentralisation has contributed to increased citizen participation and localized development initiatives in some regions. The key conclusion is that the paper identifies innovative countermeasures like a hybrid governance model that integrates traditional chiefs with elected officials. These finding challenges conventional decentralisation theories, emphasising the need for context-sensitive reforms that address Ghana’s unique political and socio-economic development realities. The paper concludes that for decentralisation to achieve its intended goals, reforms must address fiscal autonomy, strengthen institutional capacity, and minimize political manipulation. A more inclusive governance approach, integrating traditional and formal systems, could enhance legitimacy and development outcomes. This paper contributes to broader debates on the political economy of decentralisation in sub-Saharan Africa, offering policy recommendations for improving local governance and sustainable development in Ghana.

Modern EconomyVol. 16(06)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Local Government Finance and Decentralization
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.