Assessing SWOT's Hydraulic Visibility on the Rhine: Precision Flow Lines and Slope‐Based Flood Wave Propagation Signatures

Abstract This study confirms the high accuracy of SWOT in capturing river surface elevations, slopes and hydraulic dynamics over the Franco‐German Rhine, exceeding expectations. By leveraging in situ networks, we evaluate SWOT products from pixel cloud (PIXC) to reach‐averaged measurements, demonstrating their effectiveness in mapping river surface topography and detecting key hydraulic signatures. The 1‐day Cal/Val data analysis successfully observed flood wave propagation, intumescence, and a rarely observed submersion wave positive slope, underscoring SWOT's value for river hydrology. Limitations in Reach and Node products from SWORD (Surface Water and Ocean Topography River Database), versions 14–16 were addressed by developing an improved SWORD model aligned with the Rhine's morphology, now integrated into SWORD v17. Using the RiverObs algorithm, all river products were reprocessed over the entire Cal/Val period (103 cycles), achieving a 1‐sigma absolute error of 12 cm at the node scale and 10 cm at the reach scale. SWOT data also revealed temporal river profile variations, capturing slope changes, flow waves, riffles, pools, alluvial deposits, and recharge zones. Future work will refine SWOT accuracy assessments, hydraulic denoising and slope computation, with nominal science orbit data and extend studies to narrower rivers (30–60 m width). Additionally, comparisons with high‐resolution lidar topo‐bathymetric DEMs and annual SWOT WSE profiles will advance understanding of how riverbed topography influences WSE. The demonstrated accuracy and spatial coverage of SWOT‐derived WSE and slope data highlight their potential for calibrating hydraulic models and supporting operational water management and hydraulic infrastructure planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Earth and Space Science
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2025ea004309
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.63
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing SWOT's Hydraulic Visibility on the Rhine: Precision Flow Lines and Slope‐Based Flood Wave Propagation Signatures

Sabrine Amzil, Roger Fjørtoft, Thomas Ledauphin, Charlotte Emery et al.
6 citations
Earth and Space Science
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
6.63
article

Assessing SWOT's Hydraulic Visibility on the Rhine: Precision Flow Lines and Slope‐Based Flood Wave Propagation Signatures

Sabrine Amzil, Roger Fjørtoft, Thomas Ledauphin, Charlotte Emery, K. Larnier, Nicolas Picot, J. Maxant, Hervé Yesou, Pierre‐André Garambois, Maxime Azzoni
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Abstract This study confirms the high accuracy of SWOT in capturing river surface elevations, slopes and hydraulic dynamics over the Franco‐German Rhine, exceeding expectations. By leveraging in situ networks, we evaluate SWOT products from pixel cloud (PIXC) to reach‐averaged measurements, demonstrating their effectiveness in mapping river surface topography and detecting key hydraulic signatures. The 1‐day Cal/Val data analysis successfully observed flood wave propagation, intumescence, and a rarely observed submersion wave positive slope, underscoring SWOT's value for river hydrology. Limitations in Reach and Node products from SWORD (Surface Water and Ocean Topography River Database), versions 14–16 were addressed by developing an improved SWORD model aligned with the Rhine's morphology, now integrated into SWORD v17. Using the RiverObs algorithm, all river products were reprocessed over the entire Cal/Val period (103 cycles), achieving a 1‐sigma absolute error of 12 cm at the node scale and 10 cm at the reach scale. SWOT data also revealed temporal river profile variations, capturing slope changes, flow waves, riffles, pools, alluvial deposits, and recharge zones. Future work will refine SWOT accuracy assessments, hydraulic denoising and slope computation, with nominal science orbit data and extend studies to narrower rivers (30–60 m width). Additionally, comparisons with high‐resolution lidar topo‐bathymetric DEMs and annual SWOT WSE profiles will advance understanding of how riverbed topography influences WSE. The demonstrated accuracy and spatial coverage of SWOT‐derived WSE and slope data highlight their potential for calibrating hydraulic models and supporting operational water management and hydraulic infrastructure planning.

Earth and Space ScienceVol. 12(7)
Aix-Marseille Université (FR), Centre National d'Études Spatiales (FR), Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR), Laboratoire des Sciences de l'Ingénieur, de l'Informatique et de l'Imagerie (FR), CS Communication & Systèmes (France) (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Flood Risk Assessment and Management
6.63
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.