Getting Excited About Public Speaking: A Replication

Can three little words improve a person’s public speaking performance? Brooks (2014, Study 2) predicted and found that college students who were instructed to say aloud “I am excited” before delivering a stressful 2-3 min speech reported feeling more excited but not less anxious, compared to participants who were instructed to say “I am calm.” As Brooks also predicted, independent judges rated the performance of the “excited” group as better than the “calm” group across four indices (persuasive, competent, confident, persistent), and the “excited” group had longer speech duration. In a direct replication and extension, we found nearly identical results for self-report, but no differences between conditions on any observer ratings of performance, nor on an additional indirect measure of anxiety (Emotional Stroop). We discuss why this minimal reappraisal intervention affected self-report but did not result in observable improvements in public speaking.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology of Language and Communication
Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.58734/plc-2025-0011
Primary Topic
Communication in Education and Healthcare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Getting Excited About Public Speaking: A Replication

Michela Pasqualini, Michelle Poynter
1 links
Psychology of Language and Communication
Communication in Education and Healthcare
article

Getting Excited About Public Speaking: A Replication

Michela Pasqualini, Michelle Poynter
article en

Abstract

Can three little words improve a person’s public speaking performance? Brooks (2014, Study 2) predicted and found that college students who were instructed to say aloud “I am excited” before delivering a stressful 2-3 min speech reported feeling more excited but not less anxious, compared to participants who were instructed to say “I am calm.” As Brooks also predicted, independent judges rated the performance of the “excited” group as better than the “calm” group across four indices (persuasive, competent, confident, persistent), and the “excited” group had longer speech duration. In a direct replication and extension, we found nearly identical results for self-report, but no differences between conditions on any observer ratings of performance, nor on an additional indirect measure of anxiety (Emotional Stroop). We discuss why this minimal reappraisal intervention affected self-report but did not result in observable improvements in public speaking.

Psychology of Language and Communication
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Communication in Education and Healthcare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Getting Excited About Public Speaking: A Replication — Michela Pasqualini, Michelle Poynter · Psychology of Language and Communication (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS