The Paradox of Inclusion: Non-Binary Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Work in a Dualistic World

Despite decades of policy and programming, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) initiatives remain constrained by the binary logic embedded in traditional organisational thinking. This paper critiques the positivist and dualistic assumptions that shape the environments in which EDI practitioners operate. We argue that modernist frameworks oversimplify complex social realities, obscure systemic harm and trauma, and reinforce hierarchical structures rooted in coloniality and white supremacy. Drawing on social constructionism – particularly Bakhtin’s concept of polyphony –we propose that a paradigmatic shift toward non-binary, relational, and polyvocal approaches to organising is essential if we are to disrupt entrenched ways of thinking and the socially constructed patterns of hierarchical othering they normalise. Through reflexive discussion of our thoughts, experiences, complicities, and biases, we explore how polyphonic organising, grounded in a pedagogy of love, offers a pragmatic framework for cultivating inclusive, dynamic, and ethically responsive human systems. We contend that the efficacy of EDI programming will remain limited unless organisations move beyond their colonial, neoliberal, and binary legacy. In an era of rising anti-EDI sentiment, we offer this paper as a reflexive, visceral, and hopeful response to the so-called culture wars – and the urgent need for systemic transformation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Murmurations Journal of Transformative Systemic Practice
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.28963/8.2.3
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Paradox of Inclusion: Non-Binary Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Work in a Dualistic World

Candis Mary-Dauphin, Lucy Aphramor, Patrick K. Goh
Murmurations Journal of Transformative Systemic Practice
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

The Paradox of Inclusion: Non-Binary Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion Work in a Dualistic World

Candis Mary-Dauphin, Lucy Aphramor, Patrick K. Goh
article en

Abstract

Despite decades of policy and programming, Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion (EDI) initiatives remain constrained by the binary logic embedded in traditional organisational thinking. This paper critiques the positivist and dualistic assumptions that shape the environments in which EDI practitioners operate. We argue that modernist frameworks oversimplify complex social realities, obscure systemic harm and trauma, and reinforce hierarchical structures rooted in coloniality and white supremacy. Drawing on social constructionism – particularly Bakhtin’s concept of polyphony –we propose that a paradigmatic shift toward non-binary, relational, and polyvocal approaches to organising is essential if we are to disrupt entrenched ways of thinking and the socially constructed patterns of hierarchical othering they normalise. Through reflexive discussion of our thoughts, experiences, complicities, and biases, we explore how polyphonic organising, grounded in a pedagogy of love, offers a pragmatic framework for cultivating inclusive, dynamic, and ethically responsive human systems. We contend that the efficacy of EDI programming will remain limited unless organisations move beyond their colonial, neoliberal, and binary legacy. In an era of rising anti-EDI sentiment, we offer this paper as a reflexive, visceral, and hopeful response to the so-called culture wars – and the urgent need for systemic transformation.

Murmurations Journal of Transformative Systemic PracticeVol. 8(2)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.