Ambiguity as the Creator of Multilayered Poetry: An Example of a Gazel by Fuzûlî

In this study, I analyze a sixteenth-century Turkish gazel by Fuzûlî using a technique from the book Linguistics Meets Literature. By applying this technique, first used to analyze Emily Dickinson’s English poems, to a Turkish poem, I find Fuzûlî’s deliberate use of ambiguity. I examine whether all types of ambiguity (lexical, syntactic, and referential) are instantiated in the poem and how this affects the overall interpretation of the poem. I find that they are all present in the poem and that the poet deliberately uses them to make his poem open to multiple meanings. This use results in two different overall readings: the “Powerful Lover” reading, which portrays a dynamic, powerful and arrogant lover, and the “Powerless Lover” reading, which portrays a stable, powerless, and shy lover. Therefore, interestingly, two poets from different times and cultures use ambiguity to create multilayered poems, and ambiguity has always had that function.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi insan ve toplum bilimleri dergisi.
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.35237/suitder.1632722
Primary Topic
Linguistics and Cultural Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ambiguity as the Creator of Multilayered Poetry: An Example of a Gazel by Fuzûlî

Abdullah Tahir Özdemir
Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi insan ve toplum bilimleri dergisi.
Linguistics and Cultural Studies
article

Ambiguity as the Creator of Multilayered Poetry: An Example of a Gazel by Fuzûlî

Abdullah Tahir Özdemir
article en

Abstract

In this study, I analyze a sixteenth-century Turkish gazel by Fuzûlî using a technique from the book Linguistics Meets Literature. By applying this technique, first used to analyze Emily Dickinson’s English poems, to a Turkish poem, I find Fuzûlî’s deliberate use of ambiguity. I examine whether all types of ambiguity (lexical, syntactic, and referential) are instantiated in the poem and how this affects the overall interpretation of the poem. I find that they are all present in the poem and that the poet deliberately uses them to make his poem open to multiple meanings. This use results in two different overall readings: the “Powerful Lover” reading, which portrays a dynamic, powerful and arrogant lover, and the “Powerless Lover” reading, which portrays a stable, powerless, and shy lover. Therefore, interestingly, two poets from different times and cultures use ambiguity to create multilayered poems, and ambiguity has always had that function.

Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi insan ve toplum bilimleri dergisi.(63)
Karabük University (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Linguistics and Cultural Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.