An Exploratory Thematic Analysis of the Decision Challenges Faced by Emergency Responders During the 2017 Manchester Arena Attack

On 22 May 2017, the Manchester Arena bombing resulted in twenty-two fatalities, marking the United Kingdom’s most lethal terrorist attack since 2005. A subsequent public inquiry revealed the necessity for improved operational, tactical and strategic response and management strategies, and highlighted the barriers to effective decision-making processes of those present during the incident. Integrating macro-level societal ideologies, meso-level group dynamics and micro-level individual factors to understand decision-making complexities and the challenges, the present study thematically evaluated decision making, providing fresh insights into the multifaceted nature of high-stakes decision making. Using twelve transcripts, with an applied data saturation approach, findings represented three primary themes across the macro, meso and micro dimensions. Combined, these findings highlighted gaps between theoretical concepts and training, and practical application in high-stakes situations. It also highlighted difficulties in immediate response action, command and control and balancing established protocols with the need for adaptability in unpredictable emergency situations. We conclude that response decisions should be driven by the desire to optimize least-worst outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Studies in Conflict and Terrorism
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1057610x.2025.2514540
Primary Topic
Disaster Management and Resilience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Exploratory Thematic Analysis of the Decision Challenges Faced by Emergency Responders During the 2017 Manchester Arena Attack

Rebecca Milne, Brandon May, Gary Dalton, Amy Meenaghan et al.
2 links
Studies in Conflict and Terrorism
Disaster Management and Resilience
article

An Exploratory Thematic Analysis of the Decision Challenges Faced by Emergency Responders During the 2017 Manchester Arena Attack

Rebecca Milne, Brandon May, Gary Dalton, Amy Meenaghan, Marek Palace, Erica Molinario, Neil Shortland, Lee Fryatt
article en

Abstract

On 22 May 2017, the Manchester Arena bombing resulted in twenty-two fatalities, marking the United Kingdom’s most lethal terrorist attack since 2005. A subsequent public inquiry revealed the necessity for improved operational, tactical and strategic response and management strategies, and highlighted the barriers to effective decision-making processes of those present during the incident. Integrating macro-level societal ideologies, meso-level group dynamics and micro-level individual factors to understand decision-making complexities and the challenges, the present study thematically evaluated decision making, providing fresh insights into the multifaceted nature of high-stakes decision making. Using twelve transcripts, with an applied data saturation approach, findings represented three primary themes across the macro, meso and micro dimensions. Combined, these findings highlighted gaps between theoretical concepts and training, and practical application in high-stakes situations. It also highlighted difficulties in immediate response action, command and control and balancing established protocols with the need for adaptability in unpredictable emergency situations. We conclude that response decisions should be driven by the desire to optimize least-worst outcomes.

Studies in Conflict and Terrorism
Florida Institute of Technology (US), United States Department of Justice (US), University of Winchester (GB), Florida Gulf Coast University (US), University of Portsmouth (GB), Liverpool John Moores University (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Disaster Management and Resilience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.