Successful Primary Coronary Intervention and Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring During Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System (LUCAS) Mechanical Chest Compression: Case Report

Introduction: Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction demands urgent intervention to restore coronary blood flow, with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as the preferred treatment. However, sudden cardiac arrest remains a significant complication, occurring in approximately 1.3% of PCI patients. In such critical situations, delivering high-quality and uninterrupted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a priority. CPR in acute myocardial infarction presents challenges and opportunities when combined with primary PCI. The key to favorable outcomes is immediate resuscitation efforts and timely revascularization of the occluded artery. However, conflict arises between these actions. Case Report: We report a case of a 54-year-old male patient who suffered an acute myocardial infarction and underwent successful primary PCI with invasive blood pressure monitoring while being in cardiac arrest, as well continuous CPR with the use of the Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System (LUCAS), an automated chest compression device. We documented an invasive blood pressure measurement up to 161/69 mmHg during CPR. Discussion: Manual CPR in catheterization laboratories is challenging due to space limitations and radiation, especially in cases of refractory prolonged cardiac arrest. Mechanical chest compressors are a potential alternative but their efficacy and practicality are still being explored. Simply because arterial cannulation limits blood pressure measurement, there is little thorough evidence on hemodynamic outcomes with mechanical chest compressions. Conclusion: The evolution of mechanical CPR in catheterization laboratories necessitates ongoing research and clinical guidelines to optimize its application and ensure optimal patient care.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Dubai Medical Journal
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18502/dmj.v8i2.18996
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Successful Primary Coronary Intervention and Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring During Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System (LUCAS) Mechanical Chest Compression: Case Report

Sadeq Tabatabai, Ali Khalifeh, J Alhashmi
Dubai Medical Journal
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

Successful Primary Coronary Intervention and Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring During Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System (LUCAS) Mechanical Chest Compression: Case Report

Sadeq Tabatabai, Ali Khalifeh, J Alhashmi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction demands urgent intervention to restore coronary blood flow, with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) as the preferred treatment. However, sudden cardiac arrest remains a significant complication, occurring in approximately 1.3% of PCI patients. In such critical situations, delivering high-quality and uninterrupted cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is a priority. CPR in acute myocardial infarction presents challenges and opportunities when combined with primary PCI. The key to favorable outcomes is immediate resuscitation efforts and timely revascularization of the occluded artery. However, conflict arises between these actions. Case Report: We report a case of a 54-year-old male patient who suffered an acute myocardial infarction and underwent successful primary PCI with invasive blood pressure monitoring while being in cardiac arrest, as well continuous CPR with the use of the Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System (LUCAS), an automated chest compression device. We documented an invasive blood pressure measurement up to 161/69 mmHg during CPR. Discussion: Manual CPR in catheterization laboratories is challenging due to space limitations and radiation, especially in cases of refractory prolonged cardiac arrest. Mechanical chest compressors are a potential alternative but their efficacy and practicality are still being explored. Simply because arterial cannulation limits blood pressure measurement, there is little thorough evidence on hemodynamic outcomes with mechanical chest compressions. Conclusion: The evolution of mechanical CPR in catheterization laboratories necessitates ongoing research and clinical guidelines to optimize its application and ensure optimal patient care.

Dubai Medical JournalVol. 8(2)
Dubai Hospital (AE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Successful Primary Coronary Intervention and Invasive Blood Pressure Monitoring During Lund University Cardiopulmonary Assist System (LUCAS) Mechanical Chest Compression: Case Report — Sadeq Tabatabai, Ali Khalifeh, et al. · Dubai Medical Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS