Perceived sense of closeness and belonging for relative versus nonrelative adoptive families

Abstract Objective This study investigated how relationships were perceived by young adults (YA) who were adopted and adoptive parents (AP) and differences by relationship type: (a) relatives versus nonrelatives and (b) grandparents versus other relatives versus nonrelatives. Background Research is lacking on the impact of different relationship types on closeness and belonging from both YA and AP perspectives. Methods Descriptive and bivariate analyses examined differences among distinct relationship types. Logistic regression analyses for YA ( n = 187) and AP ( n = 291) samples examined how relationship types impacted perceived sense of closeness and belonging. Results In both YA and AP samples, grandparents had higher odds of reporting a sense of closeness and belonging in adoption relationship compared with other relatives and nonrelatives. Overall, higher levels of a perceived sense of closeness and belonging were reported for the AP samples than for the YA samples. Conclusion Although kinship adoption generally presents unique advantages over non‐kinship adoption, experiences vary by relationship type. Adoption by more distant relatives may present greater risk than adoption by grandparents. Further, AP may perceive greater closeness and belonging than YA. Implications Different supports may be necessary for adoptive families based on the nature of the relative status between AP and YA. For example, grandparents and distantly related caregivers may have very different service and support needs, and policy makers and service providers should consider the unique strengths and needs of each type of adoptive family.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Family Relations
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/fare.70008
Primary Topic
Child Welfare and Adoption
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perceived sense of closeness and belonging for relative versus nonrelative adoptive families

Rong Bai, Braveheart Gillani, Kevin R. White, Nancy Rolock et al.
Family Relations
Child Welfare and Adoption
article

Perceived sense of closeness and belonging for relative versus nonrelative adoptive families

Rong Bai, Braveheart Gillani, Kevin R. White, Nancy Rolock, Jeesoo Jeon, Zoë Breen Wood, Eun Koh
article en

Abstract

Abstract Objective This study investigated how relationships were perceived by young adults (YA) who were adopted and adoptive parents (AP) and differences by relationship type: (a) relatives versus nonrelatives and (b) grandparents versus other relatives versus nonrelatives. Background Research is lacking on the impact of different relationship types on closeness and belonging from both YA and AP perspectives. Methods Descriptive and bivariate analyses examined differences among distinct relationship types. Logistic regression analyses for YA ( n = 187) and AP ( n = 291) samples examined how relationship types impacted perceived sense of closeness and belonging. Results In both YA and AP samples, grandparents had higher odds of reporting a sense of closeness and belonging in adoption relationship compared with other relatives and nonrelatives. Overall, higher levels of a perceived sense of closeness and belonging were reported for the AP samples than for the YA samples. Conclusion Although kinship adoption generally presents unique advantages over non‐kinship adoption, experiences vary by relationship type. Adoption by more distant relatives may present greater risk than adoption by grandparents. Further, AP may perceive greater closeness and belonging than YA. Implications Different supports may be necessary for adoptive families based on the nature of the relative status between AP and YA. For example, grandparents and distantly related caregivers may have very different service and support needs, and policy makers and service providers should consider the unique strengths and needs of each type of adoptive family.

Family RelationsVol. 74(5)
University of North Carolina at Charlotte (US), East Carolina University (US), Case Western Reserve University (US), University of Missouri–Kansas City (US), Catholic University of America (US)
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Child Welfare and Adoption
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.