Evidence that cultural groups differ in their abilities to detect fake accents: a follow up

We recently reported that cultural group membership may be a predictor of the likelihood that an individual will detect a faked accent in a recording. Here, we present follow-up data to our original study using a larger data set comprised of responses from the across the world. Our findings are in line with our previous work and suggest that native listeners perform better at this task than do non-native listeners overall, although with some between-group variation. We discuss our findings within the context of signals of trustworthiness and suggest future avenues of research.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Evolutionary Human Sciences
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/ehs.2025.10007
Primary Topic
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evidence that cultural groups differ in their abilities to detect fake accents: a follow up

Jonathan Goodman, Robert Foley
Evolutionary Human Sciences
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
article

Evidence that cultural groups differ in their abilities to detect fake accents: a follow up

Jonathan Goodman, Robert Foley
article en

Abstract

We recently reported that cultural group membership may be a predictor of the likelihood that an individual will detect a faked accent in a recording. Here, we present follow-up data to our original study using a larger data set comprised of responses from the across the world. Our findings are in line with our previous work and suggest that native listeners perform better at this task than do non-native listeners overall, although with some between-group variation. We discuss our findings within the context of signals of trustworthiness and suggest future avenues of research.

Evolutionary Human SciencesVol. 7
University of Cambridge (GB), Wellcome Sanger Institute (GB), Leverhulme Trust (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Authorship Attribution and Profiling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Evidence that cultural groups differ in their abilities to detect fake accents: a follow up — Jonathan Goodman, Robert Foley · Evolutionary Human Sciences (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS