Association of meningioma grade with KI-67 proliferative index – an institutional study

Objective: To evaluate the frequency and association of Ki-67 labelling index with tumor grade in Meningioma. Material and Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted at the Department of Histopathology, Liaquat National Hospital Karachi from 1st July 2024 to 31st December 2024. A total of 107 Meningiomas that underwent resection were included in this study. After determining tumor type histologically, immuno-staining for Ki-67 markers was performed. The association between the Ki-67 index and WHO grade of Meningioma was assessed. All data was systematically recorded in a pre-structured proforma. Result: The average age at diagnosis was 48.99(14.44) years, with female predominance (60.7%). At the time of diagnosis, most tumors were grade 1 (59.8%), and meningothelial Meningioma (55.1%) was the most-common tumor type. A significant association of WHO grade was noted with Ki-67 index. The mean Ki-67 index for WHO grade 3 is significantly (20%) higher than that of grade 1 (3.86%) and grade 2 (7.34%). Conclusion: Ki-67 was significantly associated with WHO grade (p= <0.001). It is also associated with tumor type, number of mitosis and pattern less or sheet like growth (p= <0.001) helps in understanding tumor behavior and its potential prognosis. We observed that Meningiomas were more prevalent among the female population, and grade 3 Meningiomas showed an increased expression of Ki-67 index. Therefore, Ki-67 index can be used for prognostic stratification of Meningioma. Keywords: Ki-67 Index, Meningioma, Brain tumor

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Pakistan Journal of Pathology
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.55629/pakjpathol.v36i2.883
Primary Topic
Meningioma and schwannoma management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Association of meningioma grade with KI-67 proliferative index – an institutional study

Atif A Hashmi, Naveen Faridi, Humaira Erum, Muhammad Irfan et al.
Pakistan Journal of Pathology
Meningioma and schwannoma management
article

Association of meningioma grade with KI-67 proliferative index – an institutional study

Atif A Hashmi, Naveen Faridi, Humaira Erum, Muhammad Irfan, Sumbal Babar, Yousra Zahid
article en

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the frequency and association of Ki-67 labelling index with tumor grade in Meningioma. Material and Methods: This cross sectional study was conducted at the Department of Histopathology, Liaquat National Hospital Karachi from 1st July 2024 to 31st December 2024. A total of 107 Meningiomas that underwent resection were included in this study. After determining tumor type histologically, immuno-staining for Ki-67 markers was performed. The association between the Ki-67 index and WHO grade of Meningioma was assessed. All data was systematically recorded in a pre-structured proforma. Result: The average age at diagnosis was 48.99(14.44) years, with female predominance (60.7%). At the time of diagnosis, most tumors were grade 1 (59.8%), and meningothelial Meningioma (55.1%) was the most-common tumor type. A significant association of WHO grade was noted with Ki-67 index. The mean Ki-67 index for WHO grade 3 is significantly (20%) higher than that of grade 1 (3.86%) and grade 2 (7.34%). Conclusion: Ki-67 was significantly associated with WHO grade (p= <0.001). It is also associated with tumor type, number of mitosis and pattern less or sheet like growth (p= <0.001) helps in understanding tumor behavior and its potential prognosis. We observed that Meningiomas were more prevalent among the female population, and grade 3 Meningiomas showed an increased expression of Ki-67 index. Therefore, Ki-67 index can be used for prognostic stratification of Meningioma. Keywords: Ki-67 Index, Meningioma, Brain tumor

Pakistan Journal of PathologyVol. 36(2)
Liaquat National Hospital (PK)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Meningioma and schwannoma management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.