Źródła ambiwalencji emocji w relacjach rodzinnych – sposoby ich rozumienia i doświadczania

The aim of this article is to analyze the determinants of structural ambivalence experienced in family relationships. The first part presents, based on a review of the existing literature, the ways in which ambivalence is understood, the types of family relationships particularly prone to the occurrence of ambivalence, and its determinants. This article is based on data collected from 21 individual in-depth interviews with individuals experiencing emotional ambivalence in at least one intra- or intergenerational family relationship. The analysis focuses on how areas across different levels of social reality, from the individual to the macro-social, are understood, experienced, and interconnected. Respondents identified health, work, family obligations, and family role patterns/expectations as having the greatest impact on ambivalence in family relationships. The analysis allowed for the categorization of different domains of social life into two groups: triggering domains and sustaining domains of ambivalence. Triggering domains, such as health, work, or differences in worldview, are crucial for the emergence of relational tensions with relatives, while sustaining domains, such as family role patterns/expectations and social expectations towards women/men, contribute to the persistence of ambivalent relationships.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Człowiek i Społeczeństwo
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14746/cis.2025.59.2
Primary Topic
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Źródła ambiwalencji emocji w relacjach rodzinnych – sposoby ich rozumienia i doświadczania

Iwona Przybył, Honorata Jakubowska
Człowiek i Społeczeństwo
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
article

Źródła ambiwalencji emocji w relacjach rodzinnych – sposoby ich rozumienia i doświadczania

Iwona Przybył, Honorata Jakubowska
article en

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyze the determinants of structural ambivalence experienced in family relationships. The first part presents, based on a review of the existing literature, the ways in which ambivalence is understood, the types of family relationships particularly prone to the occurrence of ambivalence, and its determinants. This article is based on data collected from 21 individual in-depth interviews with individuals experiencing emotional ambivalence in at least one intra- or intergenerational family relationship. The analysis focuses on how areas across different levels of social reality, from the individual to the macro-social, are understood, experienced, and interconnected. Respondents identified health, work, family obligations, and family role patterns/expectations as having the greatest impact on ambivalence in family relationships. The analysis allowed for the categorization of different domains of social life into two groups: triggering domains and sustaining domains of ambivalence. Triggering domains, such as health, work, or differences in worldview, are crucial for the emergence of relational tensions with relatives, while sustaining domains, such as family role patterns/expectations and social expectations towards women/men, contribute to the persistence of ambivalent relationships.

Człowiek i SpołeczeństwoVol. 59
Adam Mickiewicz University in Poznań (PL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Intergenerational Family Dynamics and Caregiving
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.