Comparative Analysis of Satellite-Based Rainfall Products for Drought Assessment in a Data-Poor Region

Drought is one of the most impactful natural disasters, and it significantly impacts three main sectors of a country: the environment, society, and the economy. Therefore, drought assessment and monitoring are essential for reducing vulnerability and risk. However, insufficient and sparse long-term in situ rainfall data limit drought assessment in developing countries. Recently developed satellite-based rainfall products, available at different temporal and spatial resolutions, offer a valuable alternative in data-poor regions like Sri Lanka, where rain gauge networks are sparse and maintenance issues are prevalent. This study evaluates the accuracy of satellite-based rainfall estimates compared to in situ observations for drought assessment within the Mi Oya River Basin, Sri Lanka. We assessed the performance of various satellite-based rainfall products, including IMERG, GSMaP, CHIRPS, PERSIANN, and PERSIANN-CDR, by comparing them with ground-based observations over 20 years, from 2003 to 2022. Our methodology involved checking detection accuracy using the False Alarm Ratio (FAR), Probability of Detection (POD), and Critical Success Index (CSI), and assessing accuracy through metrics such as Root Mean Square Error (RMSE), Pearson Correlation Coefficient (CC), Percentage Bias (PBias), and Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE). The two best-performing satellite-based rainfall products were used for meteorological and hydrological drought assessment. In the accuracy detection metrics, the results indicate that while products like IMERG and GSMaP generally provide reliable rainfall estimates, others like PERSIANN and PERSIANN-CDR tend to overestimate rainfall. For instance, IMERG shows a CSI range of 0.04–0.25 for moderate and heavy rainfall and 0.10–0.30 for light rainfall. On a monthly scale, IMERG and CHIRPS showed the highest performance, with CC (NSE) values of 0.81–0.94 (0.53–0.83) and 0.79–0.86 (0.54–0.74), respectively. However, GSMaP showed the lowest bias, with a range of −17.1–13.2%. Recorded drought periods over 1981–2022 (1998–2022) were reasonably well captured by CHIRPS (IMERG) products in the Mi Oya River Basin. Our results highlighted uncertainties and discrepancies in the capability of different rainfall products to assess drought conditions. This research provides valuable insights for optimizing the use of satellite rainfall products in hydrological modeling and disaster preparedness in the Mi Oya River Basin.