Development of Importance Measures Reflecting the Risk Triplet in Dynamic Probabilistic Risk Assessment: A Case Study Using MELCOR and RAPID

While traditional risk importance measures in probabilistic risk assessment are effective for ranking safety-significant components, they often overlook critical aspects such as the timing of accident progression and consequences. Dynamic probabilistic risk assessment offers a framework to quantify such risk information, but standardized approaches for estimating risk importance measures remain underdeveloped. This study addresses this gap by: (1) reviewing traditional risk importance measures and their regulatory applications, highlighting their limitations, and introducing newly proposed risk-triplet-based risk importance measures, consisting of timing-based worth, frequency-based worth, and consequence-based worth; (2) conducting a case study of Level 2 dynamic probabilistic risk assessment using the Japan Atomic Energy Agency’s RAPID tool coupled with the severe accident code of MELCOR 2.2 to simulate a station blackout scenario in a boiling water reactor, generating probabilistically sampled sequences with quantified timing, frequency, and consequence of source term release; (3) demonstrating that the new risk importance measures provide differentiated insights into risk significance, enabling multidimensional prioritization of systems and mitigation strategies; for example, the timing-based worth quantifies the delay effect of mitigation systems, and the consequence-based worth evaluates consequence-mitigating potential. This study underscores the potential of dynamic probabilistic risk assessment and risk-triplet-based risk importance measures to support risk-informed and performance-based regulatory decision-making, particularly in contexts where the timing and severity of accident consequences are critical.