Perpendicular‐Parallel Asymmetry of Venus Bow Shock Under Different Parker Spiral Angles

Abstract Several typical asymmetries in the Venusian bow shock (BS) location, including the magnetic north‐south asymmetry, the pole‐equator asymmetry, and the perpendicular‐parallel asymmetry, have been proven to be controlled or affected by the interplanetary magnetic field orientation. The physical reasons behind the perpendicular‐parallel shock asymmetry remain inadequately explained. The effects of ion‐scale dynamics have not been adequately addressed in both previous observational data and numerical simulations. Using global multifluid simulations, we demonstrate that the electric field strength differs significantly between the two types of BS, resulting in their asymmetric positions relative to the planet. The quasi‐perpendicular BS generates a stronger Hall electric field, which decelerates the solar wind at a greater distance from Venus. In contrast, the weaker electric field at the quasi‐parallel BS only effectively slows down the solar wind closer to the planet, leading to further compression of the induced magnetosphere and an enhanced ambipolar electric field due to increased electron pressure gradients. The differential energy transfer from the solar wind at the two BS types contributes to the asymmetry in plasma flow and magnetic field accumulation downstream. These findings provide new insights into the plasma dynamics around unmagnetized planets and highlight the role of electric field structure in shaping the induced magnetosphere of Venus.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2024je008829
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.15

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perpendicular‐Parallel Asymmetry of Venus Bow Shock Under Different Parker Spiral Angles

Shibang Li, Haoyu Lu, Jinbin Cao, Jianxuan Wang et al.
1 citations
Journal of Geophysical Research Planets
Planetary Science and Exploration
1.15
article

Perpendicular‐Parallel Asymmetry of Venus Bow Shock Under Different Parker Spiral Angles

Shibang Li, Haoyu Lu, Jinbin Cao, Jianxuan Wang, Yihui Song, Mingyu Wu, Jianing Zhao, Nihan Chen, Yuchen Cao
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Several typical asymmetries in the Venusian bow shock (BS) location, including the magnetic north‐south asymmetry, the pole‐equator asymmetry, and the perpendicular‐parallel asymmetry, have been proven to be controlled or affected by the interplanetary magnetic field orientation. The physical reasons behind the perpendicular‐parallel shock asymmetry remain inadequately explained. The effects of ion‐scale dynamics have not been adequately addressed in both previous observational data and numerical simulations. Using global multifluid simulations, we demonstrate that the electric field strength differs significantly between the two types of BS, resulting in their asymmetric positions relative to the planet. The quasi‐perpendicular BS generates a stronger Hall electric field, which decelerates the solar wind at a greater distance from Venus. In contrast, the weaker electric field at the quasi‐parallel BS only effectively slows down the solar wind closer to the planet, leading to further compression of the induced magnetosphere and an enhanced ambipolar electric field due to increased electron pressure gradients. The differential energy transfer from the solar wind at the two BS types contributes to the asymmetry in plasma flow and magnetic field accumulation downstream. These findings provide new insights into the plasma dynamics around unmagnetized planets and highlight the role of electric field structure in shaping the induced magnetosphere of Venus.

Journal of Geophysical Research PlanetsVol. 130(7)
Harbin Institute of Technology (CN), Beihang University (CN), Ministry of Industry and Information Technology (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Planetary Science and Exploration
1.15
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.