Die hohen unbekannten CO2-Vermeidungskosten ordnungsrechtlicher Klimaschutzmaßnahmen: Empirische Beispiele aus Deutschland und Europa

Abstract The economic literature suggests that a cost-efficient climate protection policy should primarily rely on the price mechanism and emissions trading. An emissions trading system has been in place in the European Union since 2005, but only covers a few sectors, such as the energy and the industry sector. In other sectors, attempts are instead being made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by means of regulatory measures such as bans, particularly in Germany. This paper estimates the emission abatement costs of regulatory measures such as EU emission standards for cars and a general speed limit on highways. While the costs of regulatory measures are notoriously opaque, our exemplary calculations for speed limits show that bans can entail high hidden costs. To avoid making climate protection more expensive than necessary, politicians should therefore refrain from regulatory measures such as bans and rely more heavily on the highly effective and cost-efficient instrument of emissions trading.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/zfwp-2025-2009
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Die hohen unbekannten CO2-Vermeidungskosten ordnungsrechtlicher Klimaschutzmaßnahmen: Empirische Beispiele aus Deutschland und Europa

Manuel Frondel
Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
article

Die hohen unbekannten CO2-Vermeidungskosten ordnungsrechtlicher Klimaschutzmaßnahmen: Empirische Beispiele aus Deutschland und Europa

Manuel Frondel
article en

Abstract

Abstract The economic literature suggests that a cost-efficient climate protection policy should primarily rely on the price mechanism and emissions trading. An emissions trading system has been in place in the European Union since 2005, but only covers a few sectors, such as the energy and the industry sector. In other sectors, attempts are instead being made to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by means of regulatory measures such as bans, particularly in Germany. This paper estimates the emission abatement costs of regulatory measures such as EU emission standards for cars and a general speed limit on highways. While the costs of regulatory measures are notoriously opaque, our exemplary calculations for speed limits show that bans can entail high hidden costs. To avoid making climate protection more expensive than necessary, politicians should therefore refrain from regulatory measures such as bans and rely more heavily on the highly effective and cost-efficient instrument of emissions trading.

Zeitschrift für WirtschaftspolitikVol. 74(2)
RWI – Leibniz Institute for Economic Research (DE), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 91%
Energy, Environment, and Transportation Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Die hohen unbekannten CO2-Vermeidungskosten ordnungsrechtlicher Klimaschutzmaßnahmen: Empirische Beispiele aus Deutschland und Europa — Manuel Frondel · Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftspolitik (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS