Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block as an Analgesic Alternative in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A prospective Randomized Controlled study

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) became a widespread procedure with less invasive technique for treatment of gallbladder diseases. LC is associated with moderate to severe pain despite all currently available conventional analgesic regimes. Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block is reported to lead to analgesic effect on somatic and visceral pain. Objectives: evaluate the role of ESP block in control of post-operative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and decrease the need to opioids and avoid their complications particularly postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), decrease duration of both Postanethestic care unit (PACU) and hospital stay. Patients and methods: This was a prospective clinical trial involved 60 adult patients divided into Group E (ESP group) received ultrasound guided ESP block and Group C (control group) received conventional analgesia with general anesthesia for both groups. Postoperative pain was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and postoperative opioid consumption and PONV and other complications, and duration of stay in both PACU and hospital all were recorded. Results: There was a significant decrease in group E when compared to group C regarding Follow up VAS score through the first day post-operative (p < 0.05). We found more opioid consumption in group C with mean 13.40±5.83 in comparison to a mean 2.40±4.05 for group E (P<0.05).Also results show less stay time in PACU or in hospital in group E with mean of 2.43± 0.504 hour and 2.27± 0.450 day respectively in comparison to group C. Conclusion: ESB provided better pain control, less opioid consumption and also less PACU and hospital stay than control group.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
SVU-International Journal of Medical Sciences
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/svuijm.2025.354708.2086
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Pain Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block as an Analgesic Alternative in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A prospective Randomized Controlled study

Ahmed Fathy Abdel-Latif, Abbady Abdellah Ahmed, Zeinab Mustafa Sayed, Gerges Adel Ayad
SVU-International Journal of Medical Sciences
Anesthesia and Pain Management
article

Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block as an Analgesic Alternative in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A prospective Randomized Controlled study

Ahmed Fathy Abdel-Latif, Abbady Abdellah Ahmed, Zeinab Mustafa Sayed, Gerges Adel Ayad
article en

Abstract

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) became a widespread procedure with less invasive technique for treatment of gallbladder diseases. LC is associated with moderate to severe pain despite all currently available conventional analgesic regimes. Erector Spinae Plane (ESP) block is reported to lead to analgesic effect on somatic and visceral pain. Objectives: evaluate the role of ESP block in control of post-operative pain following laparoscopic cholecystectomy and decrease the need to opioids and avoid their complications particularly postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), decrease duration of both Postanethestic care unit (PACU) and hospital stay. Patients and methods: This was a prospective clinical trial involved 60 adult patients divided into Group E (ESP group) received ultrasound guided ESP block and Group C (control group) received conventional analgesia with general anesthesia for both groups. Postoperative pain was measured using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), and postoperative opioid consumption and PONV and other complications, and duration of stay in both PACU and hospital all were recorded. Results: There was a significant decrease in group E when compared to group C regarding Follow up VAS score through the first day post-operative (p < 0.05). We found more opioid consumption in group C with mean 13.40±5.83 in comparison to a mean 2.40±4.05 for group E (P<0.05).Also results show less stay time in PACU or in hospital in group E with mean of 2.43± 0.504 hour and 2.27± 0.450 day respectively in comparison to group C. Conclusion: ESB provided better pain control, less opioid consumption and also less PACU and hospital stay than control group.

SVU-International Journal of Medical SciencesVol. 8(2)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Anesthesia and Pain Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.