Incidence of Cesarean Scar Niche After Primary Cesarean Section Repair by Three Different Techniques in Minia Maternity University Hospital – A Prospective Observational Study

Introduction: One common postoperative defect that can lead to, abnormal uterine bleeding, infertility,and pelvic pain is a cesarean scar niche. The process of uterine closure is crucial in the development of niches. Objective: evaluate and compare the occurrence and features of cesarean scar niches after a primary cesarean section using three different closure methods: single-layer, double layer non locking, and double layer with parallel closure. Methods: This randomized prospective observational study included 102 women undergoing elective primary cesarean section. Patients were randomized into three groups (n=34 each) based on uterine closure technique. Transvaginal sonography was performed at 3 and 6 months to assess niche presence, depth, residual myometrial thickness (RMT), and related symptoms. Results: Niche presence was highest in the single layer group (28.4% at 3 months; 41.5% at 6 months) and lowest in the parallel closure group (5.9% and 8.8%, respectively). Technique C (parallel closure) showed significantly less niche depth and higher RMT at both follow-ups. Symptomatic cases were also fewer within the parallel closure group. Conclusion: Parallel double-layer closure technique significantly reduces niche formation and improves uterine healing compared to other techniques. This technique may be preferable to minimize future gynecologic and obstetric complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Minia Journal of Medical Research
Published
2025-06-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/mjmr.2025.395003.1993
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Incidence of Cesarean Scar Niche After Primary Cesarean Section Repair by Three Different Techniques in Minia Maternity University Hospital – A Prospective Observational Study

Ahmed Ragab, Ahmed Kotb, Hala Gaber, Hosam Shawky
Minia Journal of Medical Research
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Incidence of Cesarean Scar Niche After Primary Cesarean Section Repair by Three Different Techniques in Minia Maternity University Hospital – A Prospective Observational Study

Ahmed Ragab, Ahmed Kotb, Hala Gaber, Hosam Shawky
article en

Abstract

Introduction: One common postoperative defect that can lead to, abnormal uterine bleeding, infertility,and pelvic pain is a cesarean scar niche. The process of uterine closure is crucial in the development of niches. Objective: evaluate and compare the occurrence and features of cesarean scar niches after a primary cesarean section using three different closure methods: single-layer, double layer non locking, and double layer with parallel closure. Methods: This randomized prospective observational study included 102 women undergoing elective primary cesarean section. Patients were randomized into three groups (n=34 each) based on uterine closure technique. Transvaginal sonography was performed at 3 and 6 months to assess niche presence, depth, residual myometrial thickness (RMT), and related symptoms. Results: Niche presence was highest in the single layer group (28.4% at 3 months; 41.5% at 6 months) and lowest in the parallel closure group (5.9% and 8.8%, respectively). Technique C (parallel closure) showed significantly less niche depth and higher RMT at both follow-ups. Symptomatic cases were also fewer within the parallel closure group. Conclusion: Parallel double-layer closure technique significantly reduces niche formation and improves uterine healing compared to other techniques. This technique may be preferable to minimize future gynecologic and obstetric complications.

Minia Journal of Medical ResearchVol. 0(0)
Minia University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.