THE EFFECT OF OSSEODENSIFICATION TECHNIQUE ON IMPLANT PLACEMENT IN THE MAXILLARY POSTERIOR REGION (CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHICAL STUDY)

Background: Dental implant became one of the most effective treatment modalities for replacing edentulous area. Since, bone density is an important factor affecting implant success, therefore, low bone density decreases chance for obtaining accepted primary stability for implant. Osseodensification technique can be used instead of conventional drilling technique to enhance primary stability.Objectives: To evaluate the primary stability and bone density using Densah burs with osseodensification technique in the maxillary posterior region.Materials and Methods: 10 Patients had D3 and D4 bone density were selected to undergo implant placement using osseodensification technique. Evaluation done included: clinically, the primary stability was measured immediately after implant placement, and the secondary stability was measured at 3 months and at 6 months postoperatively by using Osstell device. In addition, the bone density was measured preoperatively, immediately after implant placement, after 3 months, and after 6 months postoperatively by using CBCT radiographically.Results: Regarding the primary stability, the mean value was 66.10 ± 8.23 ISQ. in addition, a significant increase in the secondary stability at 3 months (with a mean of 72.10 ± 7.26 ISQ) and at 6 months (with a mean of 76.40 ± 5.70 ISQ) postoperatively. Also, a significant increase in bone density immediately after implant placement (with a mean of 361.1 ± 121.5 HU) and after 3 months (with a mean of 348.9 ± 98.29 HU) and after 6 months (with a mean of 349.4 ± 97.20 HU) postoperatively compared with bone density preoperatively (with a mean of 237.8 ± 98.87 HU).

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alexandria Dental Journal
Published
2025-06-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/adjalexu.2025.353473.1587
Primary Topic
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

THE EFFECT OF OSSEODENSIFICATION TECHNIQUE ON IMPLANT PLACEMENT IN THE MAXILLARY POSTERIOR REGION (CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHICAL STUDY)

Aya A. Sakr, Ahmed El Mahallawy, Fadel Anas Sallat
Alexandria Dental Journal
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
article

THE EFFECT OF OSSEODENSIFICATION TECHNIQUE ON IMPLANT PLACEMENT IN THE MAXILLARY POSTERIOR REGION (CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHICAL STUDY)

Aya A. Sakr, Ahmed El Mahallawy, Fadel Anas Sallat
article en

Abstract

Background: Dental implant became one of the most effective treatment modalities for replacing edentulous area. Since, bone density is an important factor affecting implant success, therefore, low bone density decreases chance for obtaining accepted primary stability for implant. Osseodensification technique can be used instead of conventional drilling technique to enhance primary stability.Objectives: To evaluate the primary stability and bone density using Densah burs with osseodensification technique in the maxillary posterior region.Materials and Methods: 10 Patients had D3 and D4 bone density were selected to undergo implant placement using osseodensification technique. Evaluation done included: clinically, the primary stability was measured immediately after implant placement, and the secondary stability was measured at 3 months and at 6 months postoperatively by using Osstell device. In addition, the bone density was measured preoperatively, immediately after implant placement, after 3 months, and after 6 months postoperatively by using CBCT radiographically.Results: Regarding the primary stability, the mean value was 66.10 ± 8.23 ISQ. in addition, a significant increase in the secondary stability at 3 months (with a mean of 72.10 ± 7.26 ISQ) and at 6 months (with a mean of 76.40 ± 5.70 ISQ) postoperatively. Also, a significant increase in bone density immediately after implant placement (with a mean of 361.1 ± 121.5 HU) and after 3 months (with a mean of 348.9 ± 98.29 HU) and after 6 months (with a mean of 349.4 ± 97.20 HU) postoperatively compared with bone density preoperatively (with a mean of 237.8 ± 98.87 HU).

Alexandria Dental JournalVol. 0(0)
National Medical Research Center of Dentistry and Maxillofacial Surgery (RU), Alexandria University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Dental Implant Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

THE EFFECT OF OSSEODENSIFICATION TECHNIQUE ON IMPLANT PLACEMENT IN THE MAXILLARY POSTERIOR REGION (CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHICAL STUDY) — Aya A. Sakr, Ahmed El Mahallawy, et al. · Alexandria Dental Journal (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS