COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC INDICES FOR PREDICTION OF FLUID RESPONSIVENESS POST OPEN CARDIAC SURGERY

Background: Superior vena cava collapsibility (SVC C), inferior vena cava distensibility (IVC D) and internal jugular vein distensibility (IJV D) can be used as dynamic parameters for assessment of fluid responsiveness.Aim: This study aimed to compare superior vena cava collapsibility, inferior vena cava distensibility and internal jugular vein distensibility as regards their efficacy for fluid responsiveness assessment post cardiac surgery.Patients and Methods: 30 patients of the American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) physical status II or III, of both sexes, aged 18-60 years and scheduled for on-pump CABG surgery were enrolled in the study.Results: SVC CI had a 75% sensitivity for detection of fluid responsiveness with 80% positive predictive value. It had a specificity of 78.57% with a 73.33% negative predictive value. It had an accuracy of 76.67%. IVC DI has a 68.75% sensitivity for detection of fluid responsiveness with a 68.75% positive predictive value. It had a specificity of 64.29% with a 64.29% negative predictive value. It had an accuracy of 66.67%. IJV DI had a 56.25% sensitivity for detection of fluid responsiveness with 60% positive predictive value. It had a specificity of 57.14% with a 53.33% negative predictive value. It has an accuracy of 56.67%. Conclusion: SVC CI had more sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in fluid responsiveness prediction followed by IVC DI and IJV DI respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Published
2025-01-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.21608/egja.2025.372186.1044
Primary Topic
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC INDICES FOR PREDICTION OF FLUID RESPONSIVENESS POST OPEN CARDIAC SURGERY

Sally A. Roshdy, Dorreya Mohammed Fikry, Moustafa Ibrahim Abd EL-Aal Halwag, A. Elshaer et al.
Egyptian Journal of Anaesthesia
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
article

COMPARISON OF DIFFERENT ECHOCARDIOGRAPHIC INDICES FOR PREDICTION OF FLUID RESPONSIVENESS POST OPEN CARDIAC SURGERY

Sally A. Roshdy, Dorreya Mohammed Fikry, Moustafa Ibrahim Abd EL-Aal Halwag, A. Elshaer, T.M. Sarhan
article en

Abstract

Background: Superior vena cava collapsibility (SVC C), inferior vena cava distensibility (IVC D) and internal jugular vein distensibility (IJV D) can be used as dynamic parameters for assessment of fluid responsiveness.Aim: This study aimed to compare superior vena cava collapsibility, inferior vena cava distensibility and internal jugular vein distensibility as regards their efficacy for fluid responsiveness assessment post cardiac surgery.Patients and Methods: 30 patients of the American Society of Anaesthesiology (ASA) physical status II or III, of both sexes, aged 18-60 years and scheduled for on-pump CABG surgery were enrolled in the study.Results: SVC CI had a 75% sensitivity for detection of fluid responsiveness with 80% positive predictive value. It had a specificity of 78.57% with a 73.33% negative predictive value. It had an accuracy of 76.67%. IVC DI has a 68.75% sensitivity for detection of fluid responsiveness with a 68.75% positive predictive value. It had a specificity of 64.29% with a 64.29% negative predictive value. It had an accuracy of 66.67%. IJV DI had a 56.25% sensitivity for detection of fluid responsiveness with 60% positive predictive value. It had a specificity of 57.14% with a 53.33% negative predictive value. It has an accuracy of 56.67%. Conclusion: SVC CI had more sensitivity, specificity and accuracy in fluid responsiveness prediction followed by IVC DI and IJV DI respectively.

Egyptian Journal of AnaesthesiaVol. 41(1)
Alexandria University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 74%
Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.