Revisiting the Omitted Price Bias in the Estimation of Production Functions

ABSTRACT The lack of information on quantities presents significant challenges for estimating production functions. As shown by Klette and Griliches in 1996, deflating nominal variables using aggregate price indices leads to biased estimators. In this paper, we show that a similar problem arises when firm‐specific prices are recovered from reported firm‐specific price changes via a recursive formula. This recursion formula depends on an initial condition given by the unobserved price level in the base year, which then appears in the empirical production function as a firm‐specific fixed effect. The standard practice is to ignore these fixed effects by setting the firm‐specific prices in the base year to a constant value common to all firms, usually unity (zero in logs). We show that this practice generates biased estimators. We examine this bias via Monte Carlo simulations and with an empirical application. Solving this problem is not straightforward and requires further assumptions because these fixed effects generate nonlinear measurement errors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Industrial Economics
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/joie.70001
Primary Topic
Global trade and economics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the Omitted Price Bias in the Estimation of Production Functions

Daniel Miles‐Touya, Xulia González, Saul Lach
Journal of Industrial Economics
Global trade and economics
article

Revisiting the Omitted Price Bias in the Estimation of Production Functions

Daniel Miles‐Touya, Xulia González, Saul Lach
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT The lack of information on quantities presents significant challenges for estimating production functions. As shown by Klette and Griliches in 1996, deflating nominal variables using aggregate price indices leads to biased estimators. In this paper, we show that a similar problem arises when firm‐specific prices are recovered from reported firm‐specific price changes via a recursive formula. This recursion formula depends on an initial condition given by the unobserved price level in the base year, which then appears in the empirical production function as a firm‐specific fixed effect. The standard practice is to ignore these fixed effects by setting the firm‐specific prices in the base year to a constant value common to all firms, usually unity (zero in logs). We show that this practice generates biased estimators. We examine this bias via Monte Carlo simulations and with an empirical application. Solving this problem is not straightforward and requires further assumptions because these fixed effects generate nonlinear measurement errors.

Journal of Industrial EconomicsVol. 73(4)
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL), Centre for Economic Policy Research (GB), Universidade de Vigo (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Global trade and economics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Revisiting the Omitted Price Bias in the Estimation of Production Functions — Daniel Miles‐Touya, Xulia González, et al. · Journal of Industrial Economics (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS