Teaching Computational Tools in Chemical Engineering Curriculum in Preparation for the Capstone Design Project

UCL Chemical Engineering ensures graduates are digitally literate by integrating computational tools like gPROMS, Aspen Plus, and GAMS into the undergraduate curriculum. Students in the first year of undergraduate program use GAMS to solve simple simulation and optimization problems and gPROMS for solving ordinary differential equations (ODEs) in reactor design problems. In the second year, students start using Aspen Plus to simulate more complex chemical process units, interpret and discuss results obtained and justify any differences observed between experimental data and computational results. They use GAMS to simulate and optimize a process flowsheet with considerations of the implications of proper initialization procedures and strategies for obtaining optimal parameters and gPROMS for advanced reactor and separator problems. The computational knowledge acquired in the first two years prepares students for the third-year capstone design project where they use the various tools in designing and simulating their processes during the preliminary, conceptual and detail designs. The computational resources available to students and the additional supports provided by educators help the students succeed on the design project in the third year. This work outlines strategies for delivering the computational tools required for modules in the first two years of the undergraduate program and the application of the knowledge in the third-year design project. It demonstrates how complex process systems engineering (PSE) problems are taught, student support and resources available, and feedback for continuous improvement. It presents some challenges faced due to the use of generative AI tools and how this can be addressed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems and Control Transactions
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.126494
Primary Topic
Experimental Learning in Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Teaching Computational Tools in Chemical Engineering Curriculum in Preparation for the Capstone Design Project

Dina Kamel, Sakiru B. Badmos, A. Tsatse
Systems and Control Transactions
Experimental Learning in Engineering
article

Teaching Computational Tools in Chemical Engineering Curriculum in Preparation for the Capstone Design Project

Dina Kamel, Sakiru B. Badmos, A. Tsatse
article en

Abstract

UCL Chemical Engineering ensures graduates are digitally literate by integrating computational tools like gPROMS, Aspen Plus, and GAMS into the undergraduate curriculum. Students in the first year of undergraduate program use GAMS to solve simple simulation and optimization problems and gPROMS for solving ordinary differential equations (ODEs) in reactor design problems. In the second year, students start using Aspen Plus to simulate more complex chemical process units, interpret and discuss results obtained and justify any differences observed between experimental data and computational results. They use GAMS to simulate and optimize a process flowsheet with considerations of the implications of proper initialization procedures and strategies for obtaining optimal parameters and gPROMS for advanced reactor and separator problems. The computational knowledge acquired in the first two years prepares students for the third-year capstone design project where they use the various tools in designing and simulating their processes during the preliminary, conceptual and detail designs. The computational resources available to students and the additional supports provided by educators help the students succeed on the design project in the third year. This work outlines strategies for delivering the computational tools required for modules in the first two years of the undergraduate program and the application of the knowledge in the third-year design project. It demonstrates how complex process systems engineering (PSE) problems are taught, student support and resources available, and feedback for continuous improvement. It presents some challenges faced due to the use of generative AI tools and how this can be addressed.

Systems and Control TransactionsVol. 4
University College London (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Experimental Learning in Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.