Beyond ChatGMP: Improving LLM generation through user preferences

Prompt engineering � improving the command given to a large language model (LLM) � is becoming increasingly useful in order to maximize the performance of the model and therefore the quality of the output. However, in certain instances, the user is not able to enrich the prompt with additional and personalized details, such as the preferred tone and length of generated response. Therefore, it is useful to create models that learn these preferences and implement them directly in the prompt. Current state-of-the-art inductive logic programming (ILP) systems can play an important role in the development and advancement of digitalization strategies. For example, they can be used to learn personal preferences of users without sacrificing human interpretability of the learned outcomes. These systems have recently witnessed the development of data efficient, robust, and human interpretable algorithms and systems for learning predictive models from data and background knowledge. In this paper, one of these systems, ILASP (inductive learning of answer set programs), is used to develop a proof of concept of how personal preferences of groups of students participating in an interview exercise can be learned to tailor and improve the generated response of a LLM used in an educational context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems and Control Transactions
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.144855
Primary Topic
Topic Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Beyond ChatGMP: Improving LLM generation through user preferences

Krist V. Gernaey, Alessandra Russo, Carina L. Gargalo, Fiammetta Caccavale et al.
Systems and Control Transactions
Topic Modeling
article

Beyond ChatGMP: Improving LLM generation through user preferences

Krist V. Gernaey, Alessandra Russo, Carina L. Gargalo, Fiammetta Caccavale, Ulrich Kr�hne
article en

Abstract

Prompt engineering � improving the command given to a large language model (LLM) � is becoming increasingly useful in order to maximize the performance of the model and therefore the quality of the output. However, in certain instances, the user is not able to enrich the prompt with additional and personalized details, such as the preferred tone and length of generated response. Therefore, it is useful to create models that learn these preferences and implement them directly in the prompt. Current state-of-the-art inductive logic programming (ILP) systems can play an important role in the development and advancement of digitalization strategies. For example, they can be used to learn personal preferences of users without sacrificing human interpretability of the learned outcomes. These systems have recently witnessed the development of data efficient, robust, and human interpretable algorithms and systems for learning predictive models from data and background knowledge. In this paper, one of these systems, ILASP (inductive learning of answer set programs), is used to develop a proof of concept of how personal preferences of groups of students participating in an interview exercise can be learned to tailor and improve the generated response of a LLM used in an educational context.

Systems and Control TransactionsVol. 4
Imperial College London (GB), Technical University of Denmark (DK)
European Commission, Novo Nordisk, Danmarks Tekniske Universitet, Novo Nordisk Fonden, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Openalex Percentile: Top 92%
Topic Modeling
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.