Pareto optimal solutions for decarbonization of oil refineries under different electricity grid decarbonization scenarios

In response to global efforts to reduce carbon emissions, the oil refining sector, a major source of industrial emissions, has set ambitious decarbonization targets. This study analyzes trade-offs between minimizing CO2 emissions and costs through the use of Pareto optimal solutions. A superstructure optimization framework evaluates various technological pathways and timelines, employing a bi-criterion optimization approach using the ?-constraint method. Results show that cost-effective, higher-emission solutions often involve natural gas-based technologies with carbon capture, while expensive, low-emission solutions favor electric power-based technologies. The analysis incorporates detailed assumptions about grid carbon intensity of varying degrees and accounts for varying national policies. Comparative case studies across locations highlight how grid carbon profiles influence optimal strategies, providing insights to inform local policies and incentivize technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Systems and Control Transactions
Published
2025-06-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.69997/sct.102781
Primary Topic
Process Optimization and Integration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pareto optimal solutions for decarbonization of oil refineries under different electricity grid decarbonization scenarios

Rahul Gandhi, Ana I. Torres, S. Chattopadhyay, Ignacio E. Grossmann et al.
Systems and Control Transactions
Process Optimization and Integration
article

Pareto optimal solutions for decarbonization of oil refineries under different electricity grid decarbonization scenarios

Rahul Gandhi, Ana I. Torres, S. Chattopadhyay, Ignacio E. Grossmann, Kaliaperumal Karthikeyan
article en

Abstract

In response to global efforts to reduce carbon emissions, the oil refining sector, a major source of industrial emissions, has set ambitious decarbonization targets. This study analyzes trade-offs between minimizing CO2 emissions and costs through the use of Pareto optimal solutions. A superstructure optimization framework evaluates various technological pathways and timelines, employing a bi-criterion optimization approach using the ?-constraint method. Results show that cost-effective, higher-emission solutions often involve natural gas-based technologies with carbon capture, while expensive, low-emission solutions favor electric power-based technologies. The analysis incorporates detailed assumptions about grid carbon intensity of varying degrees and accounts for varying national policies. Comparative case studies across locations highlight how grid carbon profiles influence optimal strategies, providing insights to inform local policies and incentivize technologies.

Systems and Control TransactionsVol. 4
Shell (United States) (US), Carnegie Mellon University (US)
Shell, Pennsylvania Department of Community and Economic Development
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Process Optimization and Integration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.