Research on scientific research performance evaluation based on IAHP-ICRITIC combined weighting

In the field of scientific research, performance evaluation is a complex task with common and typical characteristics of the industry. Reasonable and effective performance evaluation can help motivate scientific researchers and optimize resource allocation. In order to give a reasonable performance distribution plan, it is necessary to evaluate the scientific research results of each employee first. Considering that the indicator data in the attachment are all positive indicators, the extreme value standardization method is first used to standardize the data. Then, the subjective indicator weights are obtained by the interval hierarchical analysis method, and the objective indicator weights are obtained by the improved CRITIC method. Based on the idea of ​​game theory, the combined weight value of the subjective and objective weights is obtained by solving the Nash equilibrium point. Finally, the performance scores of 20 scientific researchers are calculated according to the weights of each indicator, and the total bonus is distributed according to the performance score ratio. The first worker received the highest bonus of 74,321 yuan; the eighth worker received the lowest bonus of 72,330 yuan; the specific distribution plan is shown in Table 7.