Comparision Of Intramedullary Nailing (Rush Nail) Vs. Plate Fixation In Treating Monteggia Fractures In Children

Background: Monteggia fractures are a type of pediatric injury that is regularly encountered and needs decent treatment. Surgical repair usually consists of nailing within the bone (intramedullary- Rush nail) or fixation with a plate. Results of clinical outcomes depend on both the specific benefits and the setbacks of any particular method. The best fixation techniques are controversial regarding the enhancement of functional outcomes and bone healing in children. Objectives: Comparing intramedullary nailing with plate fixation in treating Monteggia fractures in children by giving emphasis to the time of healing, rate of complications, and functional improvement. Study design: A cross sectional study. Place and duration of study: Department of Orthopedic DHQ Hospital Mishti Maila Orakzai KPK Pakistan From 05 October 2023 To 05 March 2024 Methods: This Cross sectional study was conducted in Department Of Orthopedic DHQ Hospital Mishti Maila KPK Pakistan from 05 October 2023 to 05 March 2024. all the children who had plate fixation of Monteggia fractures compared to Rush nailing. Healing of the fractures, functional results, complication, and reduced radial head were evaluated during follow-up. A statistical test was conducted to determine the effectiveness of the two methods by focusing on the p-value of significance. Results: The mean age of 8.5 years (SD \pm 3.1) out of 100 patients. Among the 50 patients treated by Rush nailing, 23 had achieved full union of the bone in 12 weeks. Fixation using plates led to 50 patients having an union in 10 weeks. Fracture healing time was another variable whose p-value was 0.02 indicating that plate fixation was statistically significant. Conclusion: Monteggia fractures can be effectively treated by both nailing the Rush and plate fixation in children. Nevertheless, plate fixation showed better results during the healing process. Study is necessary to understand how to fixate fractures, depending on their complexity, as optimally as possible.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Published
2025-06-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.63682/jns.v13i1.7785
Primary Topic
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparision Of Intramedullary Nailing (Rush Nail) Vs. Plate Fixation In Treating Monteggia Fractures In Children

Sajjad Alam, Ziyad Ahmad, Fathiah Mohamed Jamil, Muhammad Abdullah et al.
Journal of Neonatal Surgery
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
article

Comparision Of Intramedullary Nailing (Rush Nail) Vs. Plate Fixation In Treating Monteggia Fractures In Children

Sajjad Alam, Ziyad Ahmad, Fathiah Mohamed Jamil, Muhammad Abdullah, Zain Muhammad, Farhad Ullah
article en

Abstract

Background: Monteggia fractures are a type of pediatric injury that is regularly encountered and needs decent treatment. Surgical repair usually consists of nailing within the bone (intramedullary- Rush nail) or fixation with a plate. Results of clinical outcomes depend on both the specific benefits and the setbacks of any particular method. The best fixation techniques are controversial regarding the enhancement of functional outcomes and bone healing in children. Objectives: Comparing intramedullary nailing with plate fixation in treating Monteggia fractures in children by giving emphasis to the time of healing, rate of complications, and functional improvement. Study design: A cross sectional study. Place and duration of study: Department of Orthopedic DHQ Hospital Mishti Maila Orakzai KPK Pakistan From 05 October 2023 To 05 March 2024 Methods: This Cross sectional study was conducted in Department Of Orthopedic DHQ Hospital Mishti Maila KPK Pakistan from 05 October 2023 to 05 March 2024. all the children who had plate fixation of Monteggia fractures compared to Rush nailing. Healing of the fractures, functional results, complication, and reduced radial head were evaluated during follow-up. A statistical test was conducted to determine the effectiveness of the two methods by focusing on the p-value of significance. Results: The mean age of 8.5 years (SD \pm 3.1) out of 100 patients. Among the 50 patients treated by Rush nailing, 23 had achieved full union of the bone in 12 weeks. Fixation using plates led to 50 patients having an union in 10 weeks. Fracture healing time was another variable whose p-value was 0.02 indicating that plate fixation was statistically significant. Conclusion: Monteggia fractures can be effectively treated by both nailing the Rush and plate fixation in children. Nevertheless, plate fixation showed better results during the healing process. Study is necessary to understand how to fixate fractures, depending on their complexity, as optimally as possible.

Journal of Neonatal SurgeryVol. 13
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Elbow and Forearm Trauma Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.